Cited by 3,601EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningSecond Language Learning and TeachingSecond Language Acquisition and Learning

Task-based Language Learning and Teaching

Ellis, Rod·2003·Asian Journal of English Language Teaching

Abstract

This book explores the relationship between research, teaching, and tasks, and seeks to clarify the issues raised by recent work in this field. The book shows how research and task-based teaching can mutually inform each other and illuminate the areas of task-based course design, methodology, and assessment. The author brings an accessible style and broad scope to an area of contemporary importance to both SLA and language pedagogy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.65961/ajelt-2003-1-009

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Ellis (2003) model is the simplest and most adaptable for teachers.

    “The Ellis (2003) model is the simplest and most adaptable for teachers, and involves three optional phases: the pre-task phase, the during-task phase, and the post-task phase.”

    From Task-based language teaching online: A guide for teachers (2017) · cites this paper as Ellis, 2003

  • There are three models for task-based methodology.

    “There are three models for task-based methodology (i.e., Ellis, 2003;Nunan, 2004;Willis, 1996Willis, , 2012)).”

    From Task-based language teaching online: A guide for teachers (2017) · cites this paper as Ellis, 2003

  • In the Ellis model, grammar teaching as a means of focus on form can take place in any of the phases.

    “While Ellis (2003) also suggests that grammar teaching is best reserved for the post-task phase, in his model, grammar teaching as a means of focus on form can take place in any of the phases.”

    From Task-based language teaching online: A guide for teachers (2017) · cites this paper as Ellis, 2003

  • Focused tasks have a place both in a language programme and in research designed to inform pedagogy.

    “In Ellis (2003), however, I argued that focused tasks have a place in both a language programme and in research designed to inform pedagogy.”

    From Position paper: Moving task-based language teaching forward (2017) · cites this paper as Ellis (2003)

  • Much of the rationale for tasks is based on the interaction approach.

    “but much of the rationale for tasks is based on the interaction approach (Bygate, Skehan & Swain 2001;Ellis 2003;Long 2016;Ellis 2017b;Kim 2017).”

    From Interaction and instructed second language acquisition (2018) · cites this paper as Ellis 2003

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ellis, R.
Corresponding author
Ellis, Rod
Venue
Asian Journal of English Language Teaching
Published
2003-11-13
ISSN
  • 1026-2652 (ISSN-L)
  • 2333-7192
OpenAlex
W653288160
Cited by
3,601
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 127 · 2025: 133 · 2024: 132 · 2023: 152 · 2022: 176 · 2021: 211 · 2020: 211 · 2019: 222 · 2018: 193 · 2017: 217 · 2016: 218 · 2015: 258 · 2014: 240 · 2013: 187 · 2012: 238
FWCI
351.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Asian Journal of English Language Teaching (publishedVersion)
  • Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Second Language Learning and Teaching
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Keywords
task-based language teaching, task-based language learning, language teaching, second language acquisition, language assessment, research-practice relationship

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review