How vocabulary size in two languages relates to efficiency in spoken word recognition by young Spanish–English bilinguals
Open accessAbstract
Research using online comprehension measures with monolingual children shows that speed and accuracy of spoken word recognition are correlated with lexical development. Here we examined speech processing efficiency in relation to vocabulary development in bilingual children learning both Spanish and English (n=26 ; 2 ; 6). Between-language associations were weak: vocabulary size in Spanish was uncorrelated with vocabulary in English, and children's facility in online comprehension in Spanish was unrelated to their facility in English. Instead, efficiency of online processing in one language was significantly related to vocabulary size in that language, after controlling for processing speed and vocabulary size in the other language. These links between efficiency of lexical access and vocabulary knowledge in bilinguals parallel those previously reported for Spanish and English monolinguals, suggesting that children's ability to abstract information from the input in building a working lexicon relates fundamentally to mechanisms underlying the construction of language.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The observed significant antagonistic effect of high use of Dutch at home on the relation between Turkish and Dutch outcomes in PSG3 children replicates the inverse positive moderator effect found in previous studies of high L1 use on the relation between L1 and L2 vocabulary.
“The observed significant antagonistic effect of high use of Dutch at home on the relation between Turkish and Dutch outcomes in PSG3 children replicates the (inverse) positive moderator effect found in previous studies of high L1 use on the relation between L1 and L2 vocabulary (Cha & Goldenberg, 2015; Marchman et al., 2010; Prevoo et al., 2015).”
From Linguistic interdependence of receptive vocabulary skills in emergent bilingual preschool children: Exploring a factor-dependent approach (2019) · cites this paper as Marchman et al., 2010
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn between-group comparisons, bilingual children often have smaller vocabularies than their monolingual peers.
“in between-group comparisons they often have smaller vocabularies than their monolingual peers (Bialystok et al., 2010;Marchman et al., 2010;Scheele et al., 2010;Thordardottir et al., 2006;Vagh et al., 2009).”
From Cross-language distance influences receptive vocabulary outcomes of bilingual children (2020) · cites this paper as Marchman et al., 2010
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
How social contexts support and shape language development☆
HOFF, E. (2006) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2005.11.002 · Cited by 1,853 · cited 2× · see citing works
“At the same time, variation in lexical outcomes has been linked to differences in the quantity or quality of children’s experiences with language (Hart & Risley, 1995; Hoff, 2006).”
BackgroundA construction based analysis of child directed speech
Cameron‐Faulkner, T., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2003) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2706_2 · Cited by 527 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- Bishop DVM Adams CV Norbury CF 2004 Using nonword repetition to distinguish genetic and environmental influences on early literacy development: A study of 6-year-old twins American Journal of Medical Genetics 129B 94 96 15274048
- Bedore LM Peña ED Garcia M Cortez C 2005 Conceptual versus monolingual scoring: When does it make a difference? Language, Speech & Hearing Services in Schools 36 188 200 16175883
- Benasich AA Tallal P 2002 Infant discrimination of rapid auditory cues predicts later language impairment Behavioural Brain Research 136 1 31 49 12385788
- Cobo-Lewis AB Eilers RE Pearson BZ Umbel VC Oller DK Eilers RE 2002 Interdependence of Spanish and English knowledge in language and literacy among bilingual children Language and Literacy in Bilingual Children 118 132 Tonawanda, NY Multilingual Matters
- Conboy BT Mills DL 2005 Two languages, one developing brain: event-related potentials to words in bilingual toddlers Developmental Science 9 1 F1 F12 16445386
- Conboy BT Thal DJ 2006 Ties between the lexicon and grammar: Cross-sectional and longitudinal studies of bilingual toddlers Child Development 77 3 712 735 16686797
- Dapretto M Bjork EL 2000 The development of word retrieval abilities in the second year and its relation to early vocabulary growth Child Development 71 635 648 10953930
- Fennell CT Byers-Heinlein K Werker JF 2007 Using speech sounds to guide word learning: The case of bilingual infants Child Development 78 1510 1525 17883445
- Fernald A 2009 Developing efficiency in understanding spoken language: How infants learn to listen for meaning Invited address at the Symposium for Research in Child Language Disorders (SRCLD) Madison, WI June 2009
- Fernald A Perfors A Marchman VA 2006 Picking up speed in understanding: Speech processing efficiency and vocabulary growth across the second year Developmental Psychology 42 98 116 16420121 PMC3214591
- Gershkoff-Stowe L Hahn E 2007 Fast mapping skills in the developing lexicon Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research 50 682 697 17538109
- Graf Estes K Evans J Alibali M Saffran J 2007 Can infants map meaning to newly segmented words? Statistical segmentation and word learning Psychological Science 18 3 254 260 17444923 PMC3864753
- Hurtado N Marchman VA Fernald A 2007 Spoken word recognition by Latino children learning Spanish as their first language Journal of Child Language 33 27 249 PMC2898269 17542157
- Hurtado N Marchman VA Fernald A 2008 Does input influence uptake? Links between maternal talk, processing speed and vocabulary size in Spanish-learning children Developmental Science 11 6 F31 F39 19046145 PMC2898277
- Marchman VA 2004 Scoring program for the MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories http://www.sci.sdsu.edu/cdi/scoringdb_p.htm PMC10264806 37325729
- Marchman VA Fernald A 2008 Speed of word recognition and vocabulary knowledge in infancy predict cognitive and language outcomes in later childhood Developmental Science 11 F9 F16 18466367 PMC2905590
- Marchman VA Martínez-Sussmann C 2002 Concurrent validity of caregiver/parent report measures of language for children who are learning both English and Spanish Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research 45 5 993 997 12381055
- Marchman VA Martínez-Sussmann C Dale PS 2004 The language-specific nature of grammatical development: Evidence from bilingual language learners Developmental Science 7 212 224 15320381
- Mattock K Polka L Rvachew S Krehn M in press The first steps in word learning are easier when the shoes fit: Comparing monolingual and bilingual infants Developmental Science 20121879
- Patterson J Pearson BZ Goldstein BA 2004 Bilingual lexical development: Influences, contexts and processes Bilingual Language Development and Disorders in Spanish-English Speakers Baltimore, MD Brookes Publishing
- Pearson BZ Fernández SC 1994 Patterns of interaction in the lexical growth in two languages of bilingual infants and toddlers Language Learning 44 617 653
- Pearson BZ Fernández SC Lewedeg V Oller DK 1997 The relation of input factors to lexical learning by bilingual infants Applied Psycholinguistics 18 41 58
- Pearson BZ Fernández SC Oller DK 1993 Lexical development in bilingual infants and toddlers: Comparison to monolingual norms Language Learning 43 93 120
- Saffran JR Aslin RN Newport EL 1996 Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants Science 274 1926 1928 8943209
- Smith LB Yu C 2008 Infants rapidly learn word-referent mappings via cross-situational statistics Cognition 106 3 1558 1568 17692305 PMC2271000
- Storkel HL 2002 Restructuring of similarity neighbourhoods in the developing mental lexicon Journal of Child Language 29 251 274 12109371
- Tsao F Liu H Kuhl PK 2004 Speech perception in infancy predicts language development in the second year of life: a longitudinal study Child Development 75 1067 1084 15260865
- Werker JF Byers-Heinlein K 2008 Bilingualism in infancy: first steps in perception and comprehension Trends in Cognitive Science 12 4 144 151 18343711
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hoff, E. (2013) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0027238 · Cited by 976 · see citing works
The language and literacy development of young dual language learners: A critical review
Hammer, C. S., Hoff, E., Uchikoshi, Y., Gillanders, C., Castro, D. C., & Sandilos, L. E. (2014) · Early Childhood Research Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2014.05.008 · Cited by 410 · see citing works
Franco, X., Bryant, D. M., Gillanders, C., Castro, D. C., Zepeda, M., & Willoughby, M. T. (2019) · Early Childhood Research Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2019.02.007 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Cross-language distance influences receptive vocabulary outcomes of bilingual children
Blom, E., Boerma, T., Bosma, E., Cornips, L., van den Heuij, K., & Timmermeister, M. (2020) · First Language · doi:10.1177/0142723719892794 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Sierens, S., Slembrouck, S., Van Gorp, K., Agirdag, O., & Van Avermaet, P. (2019) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716419000250 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Receptive Vocabulary Size of Male and Female Saudi English Major Graduates
Alqarni, I. R. (2018) · International Journal of English Linguistics · doi:10.5539/ijel.v9n1p111 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
- Authors
- MARCHMAN, V. A., FERNALD, A., & HURTADO, N.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- Corresponding author
- MARCHMAN, VIRGINIA A.
- Venue
- Journal of Child Language
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2009-09-03
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 817-840
- ISSN
- 0305-0009 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7602
- PMC
- PMC2910833
- OpenAlex
- W2161957668
- Cited by
- 339
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 59 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 13.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Child Language (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01DC008838, DC008838)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD 42235, R01HD042235)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Keywords
- spoken word recognition, vocabulary size, bilingual children, Spanish-English bilingualism, lexical access, online comprehension, vocabulary development, processing speed, language acquisition
- MeSH terms
- Child, Child Language, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Psycholinguistics, Reaction Time, Semantics, Speech Perception, Statistics as Topic, Vocabulary, Mexican Americans, Multilingualism, Comprehension, Emigrants and Immigrants
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review