Tourism and Environmental Conservation: Conflict, Coexistence, or Symbiosis?
Abstract
A new and promising field has appeared as a result of the increased tourist industry based on natural resources, though too often such expansion has been achieved without due planning and has taken many people by surprise. Conservationists and their organizations have often reacted adversely to this ‘invasion’, but this need not be so. There are many reasons and examples which prove that a change of attitude, leading to a symbiotic relationship between tourism and conservation in the wide sense, can offer a very large variety of advantages and benefits—physical, cultural, ethical, and economic—to a country. A tourist industry can expect a brilliant future, based on natural assets of the environment, provided due consideration is given to the ecological principles which must guide resource-use. The alliance of those responsible for tourism with ecologists and conservationists is a natural one, that should contribute greatly to development—the right kind of development involving the right kind of change—leading to a better quality of life for all concerned.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A 1997 survey indicated that the average foreign tourist spent about two-thirds of their Costa Rican time in protected areas or traveling to them.
“A survey conducted in 1997 suggested that the average foreign tourist spent approximately two-thirds of his or her time in Costa Rica in protected areas or traveling to them.”
From Creating Ecotourism in Costa Rica, 1970–2000 (2017) · cites this paper as [4]
Cites
Recreational Pressures in the Summer Months on a Nature Reserve on the Yorkshire Coast, England
Usher, M. B., Pitt, M., & de Boer, G. (1974) · Environmental Conservation · doi:10.1017/s0376892900003908 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Conservation Organizations and Wilderness Use—a Time for Policy Appraisal?
Jubenville, A. (1974) · Environmental Conservation · doi:10.1017/s0376892900004203 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A review of human disturbance effects on nesting colonial waterbirds
Carney, K. M., & Sydeman, W. J. (1999) · Waterbirds: The International Journal of Waterbird Biology · doi:10.2307/1521995 · Cited by 389 · see citing works
Creating Ecotourism in Costa Rica, 1970–2000
JONES, G., & SPADAFORA, A. (2017) · Enterprise & Society · doi:10.1017/eso.2016.50 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
- Authors
- Budowski, G.
- Affiliations
- Centro Agronomico Tropical de Investigacion y Ensenanza Catie (CR)
- Corresponding author
- Budowski, Gerardo
- Venue
- Environmental Conservation
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1976
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 27-31
- ISSN
- 0376-8929 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-4387
- OpenAlex
- W2156547611
- Cited by
- 353
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 2.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Environmental Conservation (publishedVersion)
- reroDoc Digital Library (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Community-based Tourism Development and Sustainability
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Finance, Taxation, and Governance
- Keywords
- ecotourism, tourism and conservation, conservationists, sustainable development, ecologists, quality of life, environmental ethics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review