Cited by 38Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamicsEnvironmental Changes in ChinaLand Use and Ecosystem Services

Habitat change in the lower Columbia River estuary, 1870–2009

Marcoe, Keith, Pilson, Stephen·2017·Journal of Coastal Conservation

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11852-017-0523-7

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Anthropogenic changes beginning in the 1860s including agriculture, dike building, and dam construction altered water quality and habitat conditions, resulting in loss of 68-70% of vegetated tidal wetlands.

    “anthropogenic changes beginning in the 1860s including agriculture, dike building, and dam construction for the hydropower system, altered water quality and habitat conditions [23–25], resulting in loss of 68–70% of vegetated tidal wetlands [26].”
  • Since the 1870s, herbaceous wetland area decreased from 35,466 to 11,381 acres (68%), while forested and shrubscrub decreased from 39,439 to 12,289 acres (69%).

    “Since the 1870s, herbaceous wetland area decreased from 35,466 to 11,381 acres (68%), while forested and shrubscrub decreased from 39,439 to 12,289 acres (69%; Marcoe and Pilson 2017).”

    From Shallow-Water Habitat in the Lower Columbia River Estuary: A Highly Altered System (2024) · cites this paper as Marcoe and Pilson 2017

  • Virtually all of this wetland loss is due to the levee system, filling, and urban development.

    “Virtually all of this loss is due to the levee system, filling, and urban development.”

    From Shallow-Water Habitat in the Lower Columbia River Estuary: A Highly Altered System (2024) · cites this paper as Marcoe and Pilson 2017

  • The Columbia River estuary has lost 70% of its historic tidal wetlands, primarily to diking.

    “Like most West Coast estuaries, the CRE has been highly modified by anthropogenic activities over nearly 150 years and has lost 70% of its historic tidal wetlands, primarily to diking (Marcoe and Pilson 2017).”
  • Greater similarity in diet composition for salmon at the lower three sites was expected given the similarity in habitat mosaics in the lower estuary and given the relatively short travel time (~1 d) in which the fish migrate through the lower estuary.

    “Greater similarity in diet composition for salmon at the lower three sites was expected given the similarity in habitat mosaics in the lower estuary (Marcoe and Pilson 2017) and given the relatively short travel time (∼1 d) in which the fish migrate through the lower estuary (Harnish et al. 2012;Morrice et al. 2020).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marcoe, K., & Pilson, S.
Affiliations
  • Lower Columbia Estuary Partnership (US)
  • United States Fish and Wildlife Service (US)
Corresponding author
Marcoe, Keith
Venue
Journal of Coastal Conservation
Published
2017-06-15
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
505-525
ISSN
  • 1400-0350 (ISSN-L)
  • 1874-7841
OpenAlex
W2624665737
Cited by
38
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2
FWCI
2.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Coastal Conservation (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Environmental Changes in China
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Keywords
habitat change, land cover change, tidal wetlands, wetland loss, tidal flats, agricultural land conversion, urban development, juvenile salmonids, historical maps, habitat restoration, estuarine conservation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review