CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 36Geriatric Care and Nursing HomesAging, Elder Care, and Social IssuesNursing care and research

Balancing formal and informal care for older persons: how case managers respond

Peckham, Allie, Williams, A. Paul, Neysmith, Sheila·2014·Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement
DOI 10.1017/s0714980814000105
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

RÉSUMÉ Cette étude a examiné la façon dont les gestionnaires de cas de soins à domicile et en milieu communautaire dans la première ligne de la profession voir le rôle des aidants naturels et les facteurs qui contribuent aux décisions de ces gestionnaires en ce qui concerne l’allocation des ressources. La recherche pour l’étude a utilisé deux méthodes de collecte de données: (a) l’analyse secondaire des résultats de simulations de la balance de soins, réalisées dans neuf régions de l’Ontario, et (b) des entretiens en profondeur de suivi avec les différents gestionnaires de la B de S. Les résultats indiquent que les gestionnaires de cas sont d’accord à l’unanimité que l’unité des soins dans le secteur SDMC ne se limite pas à l’individu, tel qu’en soins aigus, mais englobe à la fois l’individu et le soignant. Nous avons constaté, cependant, des variations considérables dans l’assortiment et le volume des services SDMC recommandés par les gestionnaires de cas. Nous concluons que la variabilité de la prise de décision peut refléter la manque de réglementation, de meilleures pratiques, et de lignes directrices pour la responsabilité dans le secteur SDMC.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0714980814000105

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Discretion in home care can be inequitable, inadequate, or inconsistent, which may lead to sub-optimal or discrepant decisions across cases.

    “Such discretion can be thought of as inequitable, inadequate, or inconsistent, which may lead to sub-optimal or discrepant decisions across cases [51].”

    From Towards defining quality in home care for persons living with dementia (2022) · cites this paper as [51]

  • Canadian literature has identified variable resource allocation in home care and factors including differences in older clients and caregivers, and discretion and flexibility based on professional training and insight.

    “Canadian literature has identified variable resource allocation in home care and the factors at play, including differences in the older client and caregivers themselves, as well as the discretion and flexibility based on professional training and insight [51].”

    From Towards defining quality in home care for persons living with dementia (2022) · cites this paper as [51]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Peckham, A., Williams, A. P., & Neysmith, S.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Peckham, Allie
ORCID
Peckham, Allie
Venue
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Published
2014-04-29
Volume
33
Issue
2
Pages
123-136
ISSN
  • 0714-9808 (ISSN-L)
  • 1710-1107
DOI
10.1017/s0714980814000105
OpenAlex
W2084019500
Cited by
36
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4
FWCI
9.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified)
Locations
  • Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
Keywords
case management, home care, community-based care, older adults, informal caregivers, family caregivers, resource allocation decisions, care coordination, primary care, legislative gaps, best practices
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Decision Making, Delivery of Health Care, Patient Care, Home Care Services, Humans, Ontario, Caregivers, Case Management, Needs Assessment, Resource Allocation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review