Cited by 17Interprofessional Education and CollaborationDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchHealthcare Systems and Technology

Collaborative Approaches to Team-Based Primary Health Care for Individuals with Dementia in Rural/Remote Settings

Open access
Chow, Amanda Froehlich, Morgan, Debra, Bayly, Melanie, Kosteniuk, Julie, Elliot, Valerie·2019·Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement

Abstract

RÉSUMÉ: L’application d’approches d’équipes en soins de santé de première ligne (SPL) pour le diagnostic et le traitement de la démence est considérée comme une pratique exemplaire. Malheureusement, il arrive fréquemment que les personnes vivant dans les régions rurales et éloignées aient peu d’accès à des services de SPL spécialisés pour la démence. Le but de cet examen de la portée était d’identifier et de comprendre les approches d’équipes en SPL pour les soins en milieu rural visant les cas de démence. La stratégie de recherche utilisée a uniquement inclus des articles de revues à comité de lecture publiés entre 1997 et 2017. Quatre bases de données (Embase, Medline PsycInfo et CINAHL) ont été consultées de mars 2017 à mai 2017. Les dix études retenues montraient des degrés de collaboration et des interactions variables dans les équipes de soins. Peu d’informations étaient rapportées sur les stratégies de collaboration de ces équipes. Une adaptation du modèle socioécologique a été utilisée pour catégoriser les facteurs clés influençant les approches collaboratives. Ces résultats rassemblés pourraient être utilisés pour guider la recherche future et l’élaboration d’un modèle de soins de santé de première ligne pour la démence dans les milieux ruraux.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0714980818000727

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. S40676 · DOI
  2. Pong, R. W., & Pitblado, J. R. (2005). Geographic distribution of physicians in Canada: Beyond how many and where, Vol. 11. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Institute for Health Information. Retrieved from https://secure.cihi.ca/free_products/ Geographic_Distribution_of_Physicians_FINAL_e.pdf

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chow, A. F., Morgan, D., Bayly, M., Kosteniuk, J., & Elliot, V.
Affiliations
University of Saskatchewan (CA)
Corresponding author
Chow, Amanda Froehlich
Venue
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement
Published
2019-03-08
Volume
38
Issue
03
Pages
367-383
ISSN
  • 0714-9808 (ISSN-L)
  • 1710-1107
OpenAlex
W2921900614
Cited by
17
References
41
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Consortium canadien en neurodégénérescence associée au vieillissement
  • Saskatchewan Health Research Foundation
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Healthcare Systems and Technology
Keywords
dementia care, primary health care teams, rural health care, remote areas, interprofessional collaboration, team-based care, socio-ecological model, models of care
MeSH terms
Aged, Cooperative Behavior, Dementia, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Patient Care Team, Primary Health Care, Rural Population, Rural Health Services

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review