Cited by 27Interprofessional Education and CollaborationHealth Policy Implementation SciencePrimary Care and Health Outcomes

Ensuring the Success of Interprofessional Teams: Key Lessons Learned in Memory Clinics

Lee, Linda, Hillier, Loretta M., Weston, W. Wayne·2014·Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement

Abstract

RÉSUMÉ: Cliniques de mémoire en soins de santé primaires suscitent un intérêt croissant, car elles offrent la possibilité d’améliorer le diagnostic et le traitement de la démence. En Ontario, plus de 30 établissements de soins primaires ont participé à un programme de formation visant à aider les participants à établir une clinique de mémoire indépendante dans leur milieu de pratique. Cet article présente les principales leçons acquises dans la mise en oeuvre de ces cliniques sur la base d’une étude qui a utilisé une méthodologie d’entrevue avec les membres des équipes de cliniques de mémoire et a identifié les facteurs favorables, les défis et les recommandations pour la soutenabilité. L’accès à la formation qui facilite le transfert des connaissances et soutient les changements dans la pratique, la collaboration interprofessionnelle, et le soutien de l’infrastructure en cours était d’une importance capitale. Des suggestions pour la mise en place de cliniques et de renforcement des capacités continues ont été identifiés. Les leçons apprises sont applicables à la mise en oeuvre d’autres modèles de prise en charge des maladies chroniques dont le but est la gestion des soins de santé primaires de maladies chroniques complexes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0714980813000652

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, L., Hillier, L. M., & Weston, W. W.
Affiliations
  • Centre for Family Medicine (CA)
  • Lawson Health Research Institute (CA)
  • Western University (CA)
Corresponding author
Lee, Linda
Venue
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement
Published
2013-12-17
Volume
33
Issue
1
Pages
49-59
ISSN
  • 0714-9808 (ISSN-L)
  • 1710-1107
OpenAlex
W2159846592
Cited by
27
References
39
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
4.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (212207)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Keywords
memory clinics, multidisciplinary team, dementia care, primary care, interprofessional collaboration, knowledge transfer, practice change, continuing professional development, chronic disease management, Ontario
MeSH terms
Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Ambulatory Care, Dementia, Humans, Ontario, Patient Care Team, Primary Health Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Interdisciplinary Communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review