Cited by 17Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchPalliative and Oncologic Care

Integration of a Palliative Approach in the Care of Older Adults with Dementia in Primary Care Settings: A Scoping Review

Open access
Vellani, Shirin, Puts, Martine, Iaboni, Andrea, Degan, Christine, McGilton, Katherine S.·2022·Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement

Abstract

Abstract A palliative approach to care aims to meet the needs of patients and caregivers throughout a chronic disease trajectory and can be delivered by non-palliative specialists. There is an important gap in understanding the perspectives and experiences of primary care providers on an integrated palliative approach in dementia care and the impact of existing programs and models to this end. To address these, we undertook a scoping review. We searched five databases; and used descriptive numerical summary and narrative synthesizing approaches for data analysis. We found that: (1) difficulty with prognostication and a lack of interdisciplinary and intersectoral collaboration are obstacles to using a palliative approach in primary care; and (2) a palliative approach results in statistically and clinically significant impacts on community-dwelling individuals, specifically those with later stages of dementia. There is a need for high-quality research studies examining the integrated palliative approach models and initiation of these models sooner in the care trajectory for persons living with mild and moderate stages of dementia in the community.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0714980821000349

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Clinicians identify multiple barriers to initiating ACP conversations in persons living with dementia, including unpredictable illness trajectory, uncertainty about the right time to commence ACP, lack of time, resources, and knowledge, discomfort with ACP discussions, and difficulty determining the decision-making capacity of the person living with dementia.

    “Numerous factors have been identified by clinicians as barriers to initiating ACP conversations in PLwD including unpredictable illness trajectory; uncertainty about the right time to commence the ACP process [10–12]; lack of time, resources, and knowledge; discomfort with ACP discussions [8, 13]; and difficulty in determining the decision-making capacity of the PLwD [14].”

    From Acceptability of the voice your values, an advance care planning intervention in persons living with mild dementia using videoconferencing technology (2022) · cites this paper as [10]

    The Discussion and ACP sections identify an unpredictable dementia trajectory, uncertainty about when to discuss ACP, lack of training, and concern that discussions may cause distress. The review also reports lack of time and apprehension about patients’ decision-making capacity. It discusses limited support and funding, but does not clearly identify a lack of resources as a barrier to initiating ACP conversations specifically; page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Gamondi, C., Larkin, P., & Payne, S. (2013). Core competencies in palliative care: An EAPC white paper on palliative care education -Part 1. European Journal of Palliative Care, 20(2), 86-91.
  2. Shadd, J. D., Burge, F., Stajduhar, K. I., Cohen, S. R., Kelley, M. L., & Pesut, B. (2013). Defining and measuring a palliative approach in primary care. Cana- dian Family Physician Medecin de Famille Canadien, 59(11), 1149-1150.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vellani, S., Puts, M., Iaboni, A., Degan, C., & McGilton, K. S.
Affiliations
  • University Health Network (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Vellani, Shirin
Venue
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement
Published
2021-11-08
Volume
41
Issue
3
Pages
404-420
ISSN
  • 0714-9808 (ISSN-L)
  • 1710-1107
OpenAlex
W3212891572
Cited by
17
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
Keywords
palliative care, dementia, older adults, primary care, outcome prediction, interdisciplinary collaboration, intersectoral collaboration
MeSH terms
Aged, Dementia, Humans, Palliative Care, Primary Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review