The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
`You're only as Good as Your Last Job': The Labour Process and Labour Market in the British Film Industry
Abstract
Recent debates surrounding the future of work and non-standard forms of employment have, especially in the United States, used the film industry as an exemplar and signifier of future industrial change. Much research conducted in the film industry implicitly or explicitly draws on the flexible specialisation framework to understand industrial organisation and labour market operation. It is the contention of this paper, however, that the dual labour market analysis associated with flexible specialisation explanations is too simplistic, failing to reflect the range of factors affecting labour market organisation and operation. The resulting static and atomised analysis is, as such, ill-equipped to conceptualise the complex patterns of organisation and movement evident in the highly uncertain context of film making. Furthermore, the operation and organisation of the labour market cannot be understood independently of the management of labour within the labour process. Production company management set the context and targets of work (in terms of work scheduling, pay, and conditions) and departmental heads retain method autonomy and control the recruitment and performance of `their' group members. However, this is the case within a context in which people need to continually resecure work and maintain positions within groups and contacts. Therefore, a seeming lack of control over tasks at the point of production is reinforced by the use of labour market mechanisms and influences their form.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Rise of the Network Society
Castells, M. (2009) · doi:10.1002/9781444319514 · Cited by 4,664
Cited by
In the Social Factory?: Immaterial Labour, Precariousness and Cultural Work
Gill, R., & Pratt, A. (2008) · Theory, Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/0263276408097794 · Cited by 1,361
“Having it All” on Social Media: Entrepreneurial Femininity and Self-Branding Among Fashion Bloggers
Duffy, B. E., & Hund, E. (2015) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/2056305115604337 · Cited by 593
Hesmondhalgh, D., & Baker, S. (2010) · Poetics · doi:10.1016/j.poetic.2009.10.001 · Cited by 419
The cultural contradictions of the creative city
Pratt, A. C. (2011) · City, Culture and Society · doi:10.1016/j.ccs.2011.08.002 · Cited by 294
Gill, R. (2014) · Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society · doi:10.1093/sp/jxu016 · Cited by 294
Metadata
- Authors
- Blair, H.
- Venue
- Work Employment and Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publishing
- Published
- 2001-03-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 149-169
- ISSN
- 0950-0170 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4237344090
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: `You're only as Good as Your Last Job': The Labour Process and Labour Market in the British Film Industry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0950017001000071
- The paper
- Blair, H. (2001). `You're only as Good as Your Last Job': The Labour Process and Labour Market in the British Film Industry. Work Employment and Society. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0950017001000071
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.