Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 593

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

“Having it All” on Social Media: Entrepreneurial Femininity and Self-Branding Among Fashion Bloggers

Open access
Duffy, Brooke Erin, Hund, Emily·2015·Social Media + Society

Abstract

Against the backdrop of the widespread individualization of the creative workforce, various genres of social media production have emerged from the traditionally feminine domains of fashion, beauty, domesticity, and craft. Fashion blogging, in particular, is considered one of the most commercially successful and publicly visible forms of digital cultural production. To explore how fashion bloggers represent their branded personae as enterprising feminine subjects, we conducted a qualitative analysis of the textual ( n = 38 author narratives) and visual ( n = 760 Instagram images) content published by leading fashion bloggers; we supplement this with in-depth interviews with eight full-time fashion/beauty bloggers. Through this data, we show how top-ranked bloggers depict the ideal of “having it all” through three interrelated tropes: the destiny of passionate work, staging the glam life, and carefully curated social sharing. Together, these tropes articulate a form of entrepreneurial femininity that draws upon post-feminist sensibilities and the contemporary logic of self-branding. We argue, however, that this socially mediated version of self-enterprise obscures the labor, discipline, and capital necessary to emulate these standards, while deploying the unshakable myth that women should work through and for consumption. We conclude by addressing how these findings are symptomatic of a digital media economy marked by the persistence of social inequalities of gender, race, class, and more.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2056305115604337

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 41 references

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Banet-Weiser S., 2012, Authentic
  2. Banet-Weiser S., 2012, Media authorship, 163
  3. 10.1177/09500170122118814 · doi:10.1177/09500170122118814 · Paper page
  4. Deuze M., 2007, Media work
  5. Gill R., 2010, Managing media work, 249
  6. 10.1177/13675494030064003 · DOI
  7. Lazzarato M., 1996, Radical thought it Italy: A potential politics, 133
  8. Marwick A., 2013, Status update: Celebrity, publicity, and self-branding in web 2.0
  9. Marwick A., 2013, Presented at the International Conference on Web and Social Media
  10. MBO Partners, 2013, The state of independence in America
  11. Pooley J., 2010, Blowing up the brand, 71
  12. Shepherd T., 2014, The Routledge companion to media and gender, 157

Cited by

See all 593

Metadata

Authors
Duffy, B. E., & Hund, E.
Venue
Social Media + Society
Published
2015-07-01
Volume
1
Issue
2
ISSN
2056-3051 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2262504108
Cited by
593
References
41
FWCI
49.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: “Having it All” on Social Media: Entrepreneurial Femininity and Self-Branding Among Fashion Bloggers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/2056305115604337
The paper
Duffy, B. E., & Hund, E. (2015). “Having it All” on Social Media: Entrepreneurial Femininity and Self-Branding Among Fashion Bloggers. Social Media + Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115604337

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.