The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Unspeakable Inequalities: Post Feminism, Entrepreneurial Subjectivity, and the Repudiation of Sexism among Cultural Workers
Abstract
Work in the cultural and creative fields is marked by stark and growing inequalities relating to gender, class, and race/ethnicity. Yet, the same industries are also characterised by an ethos that celebrates openness, egalitarianism, and meritocracy. This paper explores this paradox, focusing in particular on gender inequalities. It argues that there is a need to move beyond the standard conventional explanations for women's under-representation within the creative workforce, which point to female childbearing and childcare as central. Whilst not disputing the significance of motherhood to women's career trajectories, the paper suggests that the repeated focus on maternity is problematic and may close down other areas of potential investigation and critique. The paper suggests that three alternative foci would repay attention in understanding inequalities in the CCI. First, the new, mobile, subtle, and revitalised forms of sexism in circulation urgently require further examination. Secondly, the power of the dominant post feminist sensibility which, in suggesting that “all the battles have been won,” renders inequality increasingly difficult to voice or speak about, demands critique. Thirdly, the new forms of labouring subjectivity required to survive in the field of cultural work may themselves be contributing to the inequalities in the field, by favouring an entrepreneurial individualistic mode that disavows structural power relations. These three aspects of life in the field of cultural work merit further attention and suggest that gender inequality has a variety of different causes, not all located in women's childbearing abilities. Moreover, the paper argues that the very myth of egalitarianism at work in the CCI may itself be a key mechanism through which inequality is reproduced.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color
Crenshaw, K. (1991) · Stanford Law Review · doi:10.2307/1229039 · Cited by 32,792
The rise of the creative class: and how it's transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life
(2002) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.40-2276 · Cited by 6,488
Multitude: war and democracy in the age of empire
(2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.42-3066 · Cited by 4,670
Inequality Regimes: Gender, Class, and Race in Organizations
Acker, J. (2006) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/0891243206289499 · Cited by 3,401
White women, race matters: the social construction of whiteness
(1994) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.31-4085 · Cited by 2,560
8 The Precariat The New Dangerous Class?
(2025) · Precarity in Western European Cinema · doi:10.1515/9789048560660-009 · Cited by 2,105
(2010) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822393047 · Cited by 2,043
On being included: racism and diversity in institutional life
(2013) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.50-2895 · Cited by 1,369
Radical thought in Italy : a potential politics
Virno, P., Hardt, M., & Boscagli, M. (1996) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,246
Ain't I A Woman? Revisiting Intersectionality
Brah, A., & Phoenix, A. (2004) · Journal of international women's studies · Cited by 1,138
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- 2005, Theory, Culture & Society, 10, 323
- Ashton, 2011, Convergence, 17, 307, 10.1177/1354856511405758 · doi:10.1177/1354856511405758
- Blair, 2001, Work, Employment & Society, 15, 149, 10.1177/09500170122118814 · doi:10.1177/09500170122118814 · Paper page
- 2004, JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL WOMENS STUDIES, 5, 75
- 2009, MEDIA CULTURE AND SOCIETY, 31, 151, 10.1177/0163443708098250 · doi:10.1177/0163443708098250
- 2006, WORK ORGANISATION LABOUR GLOBALIZATION, 1, 90
- 2003, CULTURAL STUDIES, 16, 516
- 2011, NEW FORMATIONS, 70, 60, 10.3898/NEWF.70.04.2010 · doi:10.3898/newf.70.04.2010
- 2006, WORK ORGANISATION LABOUR GLOBALIZATION, 1, 108
- 1987, The British journal of social psychology / the British Psychological Society, 26, 59
Cited by
The Amazing Bounce-Backable Woman: Resilience and the Psychological Turn in Neoliberalism
Gill, R., & Orgad, S. (2018) · Sociological Research Online · doi:10.1177/1360780418769673 · Cited by 389
Self-citation‘A male dominance kind of vibe’: Approaching unsolicited dick pics as sexism
Amundsen, R. (2021) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444820907025 · Cited by 55
Mears, A. (2023) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/20563051231193027 · Cited by 52
An embarrassment of riches: The seduction of postfeminism in the academy
Liu, H. (2019) · Organization · doi:10.1177/1350508418763980 · Cited by 47
Boulton, C. (2015) · tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society · doi:10.31269/triplec.v13i2.592 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Gill, R.
- Venue
- Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2014-07-24
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 509-528
- ISSN
- 1072-4745 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2893
- OpenAlex
- W2135909537
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 54
- FWCI
- 29.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Unspeakable Inequalities: Post Feminism, Entrepreneurial Subjectivity, and the Repudiation of Sexism among Cultural Workers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/sp/jxu016
- The paper
- Gill, R. (2014). Unspeakable Inequalities: Post Feminism, Entrepreneurial Subjectivity, and the Repudiation of Sexism among Cultural Workers. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxu016
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.