Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 294

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Unspeakable Inequalities: Post Feminism, Entrepreneurial Subjectivity, and the Repudiation of Sexism among Cultural Workers

Gill, R.·2014·Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society

Abstract

Work in the cultural and creative fields is marked by stark and growing inequalities relating to gender, class, and race/ethnicity. Yet, the same industries are also characterised by an ethos that celebrates openness, egalitarianism, and meritocracy. This paper explores this paradox, focusing in particular on gender inequalities. It argues that there is a need to move beyond the standard conventional explanations for women's under-representation within the creative workforce, which point to female childbearing and childcare as central. Whilst not disputing the significance of motherhood to women's career trajectories, the paper suggests that the repeated focus on maternity is problematic and may close down other areas of potential investigation and critique. The paper suggests that three alternative foci would repay attention in understanding inequalities in the CCI. First, the new, mobile, subtle, and revitalised forms of sexism in circulation urgently require further examination. Secondly, the power of the dominant post feminist sensibility which, in suggesting that “all the battles have been won,” renders inequality increasingly difficult to voice or speak about, demands critique. Thirdly, the new forms of labouring subjectivity required to survive in the field of cultural work may themselves be contributing to the inequalities in the field, by favouring an entrepreneurial individualistic mode that disavows structural power relations. These three aspects of life in the field of cultural work merit further attention and suggest that gender inequality has a variety of different causes, not all located in women's childbearing abilities. Moreover, the paper argues that the very myth of egalitarianism at work in the CCI may itself be a key mechanism through which inequality is reproduced.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/sp/jxu016

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 54 references

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. 2005, Theory, Culture & Society, 10, 323
  2. Ashton, 2011, Convergence, 17, 307, 10.1177/1354856511405758 · doi:10.1177/1354856511405758
  3. Blair, 2001, Work, Employment & Society, 15, 149, 10.1177/09500170122118814 · doi:10.1177/09500170122118814 · Paper page
  4. 2004, JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL WOMENS STUDIES, 5, 75
  5. 2009, MEDIA CULTURE AND SOCIETY, 31, 151, 10.1177/0163443708098250 · doi:10.1177/0163443708098250
  6. 2006, WORK ORGANISATION LABOUR GLOBALIZATION, 1, 90
  7. 2003, CULTURAL STUDIES, 16, 516
  8. 2011, NEW FORMATIONS, 70, 60, 10.3898/NEWF.70.04.2010 · doi:10.3898/newf.70.04.2010
  9. 2006, WORK ORGANISATION LABOUR GLOBALIZATION, 1, 108
  10. 1987, The British journal of social psychology / the British Psychological Society, 26, 59

Metadata

Authors
Gill, R.
Venue
Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society
Published
2014-07-24
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
509-528
ISSN
  • 1072-4745 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2893
OpenAlex
W2135909537
Cited by
294
References
54
FWCI
29.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Unspeakable Inequalities: Post Feminism, Entrepreneurial Subjectivity, and the Repudiation of Sexism among Cultural Workers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/sp/jxu016
The paper
Gill, R. (2014). Unspeakable Inequalities: Post Feminism, Entrepreneurial Subjectivity, and the Repudiation of Sexism among Cultural Workers. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxu016

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.