Cited by 167Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiologyFood Safety and HygieneViral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology

Risk factors for campylobacter infection in infants and young children: a matched case-control study

Open access
TENKATE, T. D., STAFFORD, R. J.·2001·Epidemiology and Infection

Abstract

Campylobacter infection has one of the highest rates of all the notifiable diseases in Australia, with a peak in children aged 0–35 months. A matched case-control study was conducted to investigate risk factors for campylobacter infection for children in this age group. Eighty-one cases and 144 controls were enrolled in the study that was conducted between 24 January 1996 and 21 January 1997. The following risk factors were found to be independently associated with illness: ownership of pet puppies (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 16·58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3·73–73·65) and pet chickens (OR 11·80, CI 1·37–101·75), and consumption of mayonnaise (OR 4·13, CI 1·61–10·59). We propose that children aged less than 3 years are at risk of campylobacter infection if residing in a household which has puppies or chickens as pets.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0950268801006306

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Juvenile dogs and cats are more likely to shed Campylobacter species than mature counterparts, and recent acquisition of a puppy or kitten is associated with the highest risk of transmission.

    “Juvenile dogs and cats are more likely to shed Campylobacter species than their mature counterparts, and recent acquisition of a puppy or kitten is associated with the highest risk of transmission. 9,18”

    From Reducing the risk of pet-associated zoonotic infections (2015) · cites this paper as [18]

    The Multivariate analysis of risk factors reports that puppy ownership was independently associated with Campylobacter illness in children under three; the Discussion also reports Campylobacter carriage in dogs and puppies. The paper does not establish that juvenile dogs or cats shed more than mature animals, or that recent acquisition of a puppy or kitten carries the highest transmission risk. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Thompson J, Lin M, Halliday L, et al. Australia's notifiable disease status, 1998. Comm Dis Intell 1999 ; 23 : 277-305.
  2. Tauxe RV, Hargrett-Bean N, Patton CM, Wachsmuth IK. Campylobacter isolates in the United States, 1982-1986. MMWR 1988 ; 37 : 1-13.
  3. Neal KR, Slack RCB. The autum peak in campylo- bacter gastroenteritis : are the risk factors the same for travel and UK acquired campylobacter infections? J Publ Hlth Med 1995 ; 17 : 98-102.
  4. Kapperud G, Skjerve E, Bean NH, Osteroff SM, Lassen J. Risk factors for sporadic campylobacter infections : results of a case-control study in southeastern Norway. J Clin Microbiol 1992 ; 30 : 3117-21.
  5. Neal KR, Slack RCB. Diabetes mellitus, anti-secretory drugs and other risk factors for campylobacter gastro- enteritis in adults : a case-control study. Epidemiol Infect 1997 ; 119 : 307-11.
  6. Eberhart-Phillips J, Walker N, Garret N, et al. Campylobacteriosis in New Zealand : results of a case- control study. J Epidemiol Commun Hlth 1997 ; 51 : 686-91.
  7. Hopkins RS, Olmsted R, Istre GR. Endemic Campylobacter jejuni infection in Colorado : identified risk factors. Am J Publ Hlth 1984 ; 74 : 249-50.
  8. Ikram R, Chambers S, Mitchell P, Brieseman MA, Ikram OH. A case-control study to determine risk factors for campylobacter infection in Christchurch in the summer of 1992-3. N Z Med J 1994 ; 107 : 430-2.
  9. Adak GK, Cowden JM, Nicholas S, Evans HS. The Public Health Laboratory Service national case-control study of primary indigenous sporadic cases of campylobacter infection. Epidemiol Infect 1995 ; 115 : 15-22.
  10. Saeed AM, Harris NV, DiGiacomo RF. The role of exposure to animals in the etiology of Campylobacter jejuni\coli enteritis. Am J Epidemiol 1993 ; 137 : 108-14.
  11. Stafford R, Tenkate T, McCall B. A five year review of campylobacter infection in Queensland. Comm Dis Intell 1996 ; 20 : 478-82.
  12. Pazzaglia G, Bourgeous AL, Araby I, et al. Campylobacter-associated diarrhoea in Egyptian infants : epidemiology and clinical manifestations of disease and high frequency of concomitant infections. J Diarr Dis Res 1993 ; 11 : 6-13.
  13. Grados O, Bravo N, Black RE, Butzler JP. Paediatric campylobacter diarrhoea from household exposure to live chickens in Lima, Peru. Bull WHO 1988 ; 66 : 369-74.
  14. Schlesselman JJ. Case-control studies : design, conduct, analysis. New York : Oxford University Press, 1982 : 354.
  15. Svedhem A, Kaijser B. Isolation of Campylobacter jejuni from domestic animals and pets : probable origin of human infection. J Infect 1981 ; 3 : 37-40.
  16. Hald B, Madsen M. Healthy puppies and kittens as carriers of Campylobacter spp., with special reference to Campylobacter upsaliensis. J Clin Microbiol 1997 ; 35 : 3351-2.
  17. Studahl A, Andersson Y. Risk factors for indigenous campylobacter : a Swedish case-control study. Epidemiol Infect 2000 ; 125 : 269-75.
  18. Doyle MP. Association of Campylobacter jejuni with laying hens and eggs. Appl Environ Microbiol 1984 ; 47 : 533-6.
  19. Gregory E, Barnhart H, Dreeson DW, Stern NJ, Corn JL. Epidemiological study of Campylobacter spp. in broilers : source, time of colonization, and prevalence. Avian Dis 1997 ; 41 : 890-8.
  20. Norkrans G, Svedham A. Epidemiological aspects of Campylobacter jejuni enteritis. J Hyg 1982 ; 89 : 163-70.
  21. Skirrow MB, Blaser MJ. Campylobacter jejuni. In: Blaser M, Smith P, Ravdin J, Greenberg H, Guerrant R, eds. Infections of the gastrointestinal tract. New York : Raven Press, 1995 : 825-48.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
TENKATE, T. D., & STAFFORD, R. J.
Affiliations
Queensland Health (AU)
Venue
Epidemiology and Infection
Published
2001-12
Volume
127
Issue
3
Pages
399-404
ISSN
  • 0950-2688 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-4409
OpenAlex
W2153507874
Cited by
167
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 14
FWCI
5.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Epidemiology and Infection (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Queensland Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Safety and Hygiene
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
Keywords
campylobacteriosis, infants and young children, risk factors, household pets, zoonotic transmission, food poisoning
MeSH terms
Animals, Animals, Domestic, Campylobacter Infections, Chickens, Child, Preschool, Diet, Dogs, Female, Hand Disinfection, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Queensland, Risk Factors, Travel, Logistic Models, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review