Cited by 12Travel-related health issuesSalmonella and Campylobacter epidemiologyViral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology

Gastrointestinal disease outbreaks in cycling events: Are preventive measures effective?

Open access
MEXIA, R., VOLD, L., HEIER, B. T., NYGÅRD, K.·2013·Epidemiology and Infection

Abstract

In 2009, following a bike race, a gastrointestinal illness outbreak affected many participants. A cohort study showed an attack rate of 16·3% with the main risk factor being mud splashes to the face. Considering these findings, in 2010 recommendations to participants in the bike race were issued and environmental control measures were implemented. In 2010, a retrospective cohort study using web-based questionnaires was conducted to measure the use of preventive measures and to assess risk factors associated with gastrointestinal illness. A 69% response rate was achieved and 11721 records analysed, with 572 (attack rate 4·9%) matching the case definition, i.e. participants reporting diarrhoea within 10 days of race. There was a clear increase in the use of mudguards (96·7% reported access to/receiving information on preventive measures) and a significant decrease in gastrointestinal illness. This may indicate that the measures have been effective and should be considered, both in terms of environmental control measures as well as individual measures.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0950268812000817

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Kapperud G, et al. Two outbreaks of campylobacteriosis after bicycle races -are mud splashes the source ? [in Norwegian]. MSIS-Rapport. Meldigssystem for Smittsomme Sykdommer 2000 ; 28 :08 : 1.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MEXIA, R., VOLD, L., HEIER, B. T., & NYGÅRD, K.
Affiliations
Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NO)
Venue
Epidemiology and Infection
Published
2012-05-16
Volume
141
Issue
3
Pages
517-523
ISSN
  • 0950-2688 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-4409
OpenAlex
W2103383534
Cited by
12
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Epidemiology and Infection (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Travel-related health issues
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
Keywords
gastrointestinal diseases, diarrhea, cycling events, outbreak prevention, environmental control measures, preventive measures, attack rate, risk factors
MeSH terms
Adult, Bicycling, Diarrhea, Disease Outbreaks, Environmental Exposure, Escherichia coli, Female, Gastrointestinal Diseases, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Middle Aged, Norway, Surveys and Questionnaires, Retrospective Studies, Soil Microbiology, Information Seeking Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review