Cited by 301Visual perception and processing mechanismsNeurobiology and Insect Physiology ResearchAdvanced Vision and Imaging

Range perception through apparent image speed in freely flying honeybees

Open access
Srinivasan, M. V., Lehrer, M., Kirchner, W. H., Zhang, S. W.·1991·Visual Neuroscience

Abstract

When negotiating a narrow gap, honeybees tend to fly through the middle of the gap, balancing the distances to the boundary on either side. To investigate the basis of this “centering response,” bees were trained to fly through a tunnel on their way to a feeding site and back, while their flight trajectories were filmed from above. The wall on either side carried a visual pattern. When the patterns were stationary vertical gratings, bees tended to fly through the middle of the tunnel, i.e. along its longitudinal axis. However, when one of the gratings was in motion, bees flying in the same direction as the moving grating tended to fly closer to while bees flying in the opposite direction tended to fly closer to the stationary grating. This demonstrates, directly and unequivocally, that flying bees estimate the distances of surfaces in terms of the apparent motion of their images. A series of further experiments revealed that the distance to the gratings is gauged in terms of their apparent angular speeds, and that the visual system of the bee is capable of measuring angular speed largely independently of the spatial period, intensity profile, or contrast of the grating. Thus, the motion-sensitive mechanisms mediating range perception appear to be qualitatively different from those that mediate the well-known optomotor response in insects, or those involved in motion detection and ocular tracking in man.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s095252380000136x

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. COLLETT, T.S. (1978). Peering-a locust behavior pattern for obtaining motion parallax information. Journal of Experimental Biology 76, 237-241.
  2. INGLE, D.J., GOODALE, M.A. & MANSFIELD, R.J.W., pp. 111-176. Cambridge, Massachusetts:
  3. M.I.T. Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Srinivasan, M. V., Lehrer, M., Kirchner, W. H., & Zhang, S. W.
Affiliations
  • Australian National University (AU)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • University of Würzburg (DE)
  • Institute of Biophysics (CN)
Venue
Visual Neuroscience
Published
1991-05
Volume
6
Issue
5
Pages
519-535
ISSN
  • 0952-5238 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8714
OpenAlex
W2144789976
Cited by
301
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 11
FWCI
4.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Visual Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • reroDoc Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
Keywords
Apis mellifera, apparent motion, angular speed, distance estimation, visual motion perception, optomotor response, flight behavior, tunnel navigation, moving gratings
MeSH terms
Animals, Bees, Distance Perception, Escape Reaction, Flight, Animal, Movement, Vision, Ocular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review