Cited by 41Robotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationInertial Sensor and NavigationAdvanced Vision and Imaging

Vision-Aided Absolute Trajectory Estimation Using an Unsupervised Deep Network with Online Error Correction

Open access
Shamwell, E. Jared, Leung, Sarah, Nothwang, William D.·2018·2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)

Abstract

Adstract- We present an unsupervised deep neural network approach to the fusion of RGB-D imagery with inertial measurements for absolute trajectory estimation. Our network, dubbed the Visual-Inertial-Odometry Learner (VIOLearner), learns to perform visual-inertial odometry (VIO) without inertial measurement unit (IMU) intrinsic parameters (corresponding to gyroscope and accelerometer bias or white noise) or the extrinsic calibration between an IMU and camera. The network learns to integrate IMU measurements and generate hypothesis trajectories which are then corrected online according to the Jacobians of scaled image projection errors with respect to a spatial grid of pixel coordinates. We evaluate our network against state-of-the-art (SOA) visual-inertial odometry, visual odometry, and visual simultaneous localization and mapping (VSLAM) approaches on the KITTI Odometry dataset [1] and demonstrate competitive odometry performance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iros.2018.8593573

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. M. N. Galfond, "Visual-inertial odometry with depth sensing using a multi-state constraint Kalman filter," Master's thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2014.
  2. E. J. Shamwell, W. D. Nothwang, and D. Perlis, "A deep neural network approach to fusing vision and heteroscedastic motion esti- mates for low-SWaP robotic applications," in Multisensor Fusion and Integration for Intelligent Systems (MFI). IEEE, 2017.
  3. E. J. Shamwell, W. Nothwang, and D. Perlis, "Multi-hypothesis visual inertial flow," IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, Submitted.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shamwell, E. J., Leung, S., & Nothwang, W. D.
Affiliations
DEVCOM Army Research Laboratory (US)
Venue
2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2018-10
Pages
2524-2531
ISSN
2153-0858 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2792489285
Cited by
41
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
FWCI
6.51
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Inertial Sensor and Navigation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
Keywords
visual-inertial odometry, unsupervised deep learning, IMU bias estimation, online error correction, visual odometry, visual SLAM

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review