Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 161

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Apomorphine blocks form-deprivation myopia in chickens by a dopamine D2-receptor mechanism acting in retina or pigmented epithelium

Rohrer, Baerbel, Spira, Arthur W., Stell, William K.·1993·Visual Neuroscience

Abstract

Studies of form-deprivation myopia (FDM) in animal models have shown that postnatal ocular growth is regulated by the quality of patterned images on the retina. One of the major challenges in myopia research is to identify the biochemical mechanisms which translate retinal visual responses into signals that regulate scleral growth. Dopamine (DA) has been implicated in this process, since retinal DA levels decline in FDM and subconjunctival injections of apomorphine (Apo, a nonspecific DA agonist) prevent FDM in a dose-dependent way (Stone et al., 1989). To gain insight into where and how DA ligands act to regulate ocular elongation, we compared the action and distribution of DA receptor ligands injected intravitreally vs.subconjunctivally in young chicks. Ocular length was measured by A-scan ultrasound. We found that daily intravitreal injections of Apo block FDM at a 50% effective dose (ED 50) of 5 pg per day, or a peak concentration in the vitreous humor of 108 pM, compared to an ED 50 of 2.5 ng for subconjunctival injections as reported by Stone et al.(1989, 1990). [3 H]-spiperone, a D 2-receptor antagonist, reached average maximum retinal concentrations of 160 pM and 260 pM, during the first hour after intravitreal and subconjunctival administration, respectively, at the ED 50dose. In contrast, the maximum spiperone concentrations in the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) were 30 pM and 410 pM, respectively, after intravitreal or subconjunctival ED 50doses. Spiperone concentrations in sclera after ED 50doses to the two sites differed by 4 x 10 4(0.4 pM vs.1.7 nM, respectively). The FDM-preventing action of Apo was blocked completely by simultaneous administration of spiperone but not by SCH 23390 (a D 1-receptor antagonist) in 100-fold molar excess. These results show that apomorphine acts to prevent FDM at an intraocular site, presumably in retina and/or pigment epithelium, but not sclera, whether administered intravitreally or subconjunctivally. A dose yielding a concentration of 100–260 pM, delivered ≤1 h per day, produces half-maximal inhibition. This action is mediated by D 2-receptors, for which the dissociation constant for apomorphine is ≤1 nM. The retinal pigment epithelium may act as a trophic relay station, responding to a retinal messenger which may be DA and secreting scleral growth-regulator(s) from its basal surface.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0952523800004673

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 161

Metadata

Authors
Rohrer, B., Spira, A. W., & Stell, W. K.
Venue
Visual Neuroscience
Published
1993-05
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
447-453
ISSN
  • 0952-5238 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8714
OpenAlex
W1990027298
Cited by
161
References
0
FWCI
6.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Apomorphine blocks form-deprivation myopia in chickens by a dopamine D2-receptor mechanism acting in retina or pigmented epithelium. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0952523800004673
The paper
Rohrer, B., Spira, A. W., & Stell, W. K. (1993). Apomorphine blocks form-deprivation myopia in chickens by a dopamine D2-receptor mechanism acting in retina or pigmented epithelium. Visual Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0952523800004673

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.