The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Spatial zones of binocular rivalry in central and peripheral vision
Abstract
This paper presents results from psychophysical experiments on human binocular rivalry in central and peripheral vision. Results show that the incidence of periods of exclusive visibility of a given eye's rival target increased with decreasing target size, and for a given sized target exclusive visibility increased with retinal eccentricity. Control measures confirmed that these results were not attributable solely to reduced peripheral acuity, to Troxler's effect, or to spatial frequency. We computed the minimum-sized stimulus that would lead to a criterion level of exclusive visibility of one or the other eye; this we term the spatial zone of binocular rivalry. The change in estimated size of spatial zones of rivalry with eccentricity compares favorably with estimates of human cortical magnification. We propose a model that assumes concentrically organized zones of rivalry. These zones do not function independently, but instead exhibit a high degree of mutual excitatory cooperativity. The model has multiple solutions for the foveal zone size, but the best fits predict a diameter of 5.3 or 7.3 min of visual angle; these values dovetail nicely with our empirical estimates of the foveal zone size.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Psychophysical magic: rendering the visible ‘invisible’
Kim, C.-Y., & Blake, R. (2005) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.06.012 · Cited by 451
Self-citationComputational evidence for a rivalry hierarchy in vision
Wilson, H. R. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2333622100 · Cited by 411
Single units and conscious vision
The American Association for Research into Nervous and Mental Diseases, & Logothetis, N. K. (1998) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1998.0333 · Cited by 375
A Primer on Binocular Rivalry, Including Current Controversies
Blake, R. (2001) · Brain and Mind · doi:10.1023/a:1017925416289 · Cited by 340
Self-citationMultistability and perceptual inference
Gershman, S. J., Vul, E., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2012) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco_a_00226 · Cited by 140
Metadata
- Authors
- Blake, R., O'Shea, R. P., & Mueller, T. J.
- Venue
- Visual Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Maximum Academic Press
- Published
- 1992-05
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 469-478
- ISSN
- 0952-5238 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8714
- OpenAlex
- W2038771199
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spatial zones of binocular rivalry in central and peripheral vision. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0952523800004971
- The paper
- Blake, R., O'Shea, R. P., & Mueller, T. J. (1992). Spatial zones of binocular rivalry in central and peripheral vision. Visual Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0952523800004971
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.