Cited by 56

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Variety of genotypes in males diagnosed as dichromatic on a conventional clinical anomaloscope

NEITZ, MAUREEN, CARROLL, JOSEPH, RENNER, AGNES, KNAU, HOLGER, WERNER, JOHN S., NEITZ, JAY·2004·Visual Neuroscience

Abstract

The hypothesis that dichromatic behavior on a clinical anomaloscope can be explained by the complement and arrangement of the long- (L) and middle-wavelength (M) pigment genes was tested. It was predicted that dichromacy is associated with an X-chromosome pigment gene array capable of producing only a single functional pigment type. The simplest case of this is when deletion has left only a single X-chromosome pigment gene. The production of a single L or M pigment type can also result from rearrangements in which multiple genes remain. Often, only the two genes at the 5′ end of the array are expressed; thus, dichromacy is also predicted to occur if one of these is defective or encodes a defective pigment, or if both of them encode pigments with identical spectral sensitivities. Subjects were 128 males who accepted the full range of admixtures of the two primary lights as matching the comparison light on a Neitz or Nagel anomaloscope. Strikingly, examination of the L and M pigment genes revealed a potential cause for a color-vision defect in all 128 dichromats. This indicates that the major component of color-vision deficiency could be attributed to alterations of the pigment genes or their regulatory regions in all cases, and the variety of gene arrangements associated with dichromacy is cataloged here. However, a fraction of the dichromats (17 out of 128; 13%) had genes predicted to encode pigments that would result in two populations of cones with different spectral sensitivities. Nine of the 17 were predicted to have two pigments with slightly different spectral peaks (usually ≤ 2.5 nm) and eight had genes which specified pigments identical in peak absorption, but different in amino acid positions previously associated with optical density differences. In other subjects, reported previously, the same small spectral differences were associated with anomalous trichromacy rather than dichromacy. It appears that when the spectral difference specified by the genes is very small, the amount of residual red–green color vision measured varies; some individuals test as dichromats, others test as anomalous trichromats. The discrepancy is probably partly attributable to testing method differences and partly to a difference in performance not perception, but it seems there must also be cases in which other factors, for example, cone ratio, contribute to a person's ability to extract a color signal from a small spectral difference.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0952523804213293

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Hayashi, T. , Yamaguchi, T. , Kitahara, K. , Sharpe, L.T. , Jägle, H. , Yamade, S. , Ueyama, H. , Motulsky, A.G. , & Deeb, S.S. (2001).The importance of gene order in expression of the red and greenvisual pigment genes and in color vision.Color Research and Application 26,S79–S83. · DOI
  2. Shevell, S.K. , He, J.C. , Kainz, P.M. , Neitz, J. , & Neitz, M. (1998).Relating color discrimination to photopigment genes in deutanobservers.Vision Research 38,3371–3376. · DOI
  3. Palczewski, K. , Kumasaka, T. , Hori, T. , Behnke, C.A. , Motoshima, H. , Fox, B.A. , LeTrong, I. , Teller, D.C. , Okada, T. , Stenkamp, R.E. , Yamamoto, M. , & Miyano, M. (2000).Crystal structure of rhodopsin: A G-protein-coupled receptor.Science 289,739–745. · DOI · Paper page
  4. Ueyama, H. , Li, Y.-H. , Fu, G.-L. , Lertrit, P. , Atchaneeyasakul, L. , Oda, S. , Tanabe, S. , Nishida, Y. , Yamade, S. , & Ohkubo, I. (2003).An A-71C substitution in a green gene at the second position in thered/green visual-pigment gene array is associated with deutancolor-vision deficiency.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A. 100,3357–3362. · DOI
  5. McMahon, C. , Neitz, J. , & Neitz, M. (2004).Evaluating the human X-chromosome pigment gene promoter sequencesas predictors of L:M cone ratio variation.Journal of Vision 2,12–24.
  6. Nathans, J. , Thomas, D. , & Hogness, D.S. (1986b).Molecular genetics of human color vision: The genes encoding blue,green, and red pigments.Science 232,193–202. · DOI
  7. Nathans, J. , Davenport, C.M. , Maumenee, I.H. , Lewis, R.A. , Hejtmancik, J.F. , Litt, M. , Lovrien, E. , Weleber, R. , Bachynski, B. , Zwas, F. , Klingaman, R. , & Fishman, G. (1989).Molecular genetics of blue cone monochromacy.Science 245,831–838. · DOI · Paper page
  8. Karnik, S.S. , Sakmar, T.P. , Chen, H.-B. , & Khorana, H.G. (1988).Cysteine residues 110 and 187 are required for the formation ofcorrect structure in bovine rhodopsin.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A. 85,8459–8463. · DOI
  9. Merbs, S.L. & Nathans, J. (1992).Absorption spectra of the hybrid pigments responsible for anomalouscolor vision.Science 258,464–466. · DOI
  10. Neitz, J. , Neitz, M. , He, J.C. , & Shevell, S.K. (1999).Trichromatic color vision with only two spectrally distinctphotopigments.Nature Neuroscience 2,884–888. · DOI · Paper page
  11. Hayashi, T. , Motulsky, A.G. , & Deeb, S.S. (1999).Position of a ‘green-red’ hybrid gene in the visualpigment array determines colour-vision phenotype.Nature Genetics 22,90–93. · DOI · Paper page
  12. Winderickx, J. , Sanocki, E. , Lindsey, D.T. , Teller, D.Y. , Motulsky, A.G. , & Deeb, S.S. (1992).Defective colour vision associated with a missense mutation in thehuman green visual pigment gene.Nature Genetics 1,251–256. · DOI
  13. Nathans, J. , Maumenee, I.A. , Zrenner, E. , Sadowski, B. , Sharpe, L.T. , Lewis, R.A. , Hansen, E. , Rosenberg, P. , Schwartz, M. , Heckenlively, J.R. , Trabousli, E. , Klingaman, R. , Bech-hansen, N.T. , LaRouche, G.R. , Pagon, R.A. , Murphy, W.H. , & Weleber, R.G. (1993).Genetic heterogeneity among blue-cone monochromats.American Journal of Human Genetics 53,987–1000.
  14. Asenjo, A.B. , Rim, J. , & Oprian, D.D. (1994).Molecular determinants of human red/green color discrimination.Neuron 12,1131–1138. · DOI · Paper page
  15. Bollinger, K. , Bialozynski, C. , Neitz, J. , & Neitz, M. (2001).The importance of deleterious mutations of M pigment genes as acause of color vision defects.Color Research and Application 26,S100–S105. · DOI
  16. Nathans, J. , Piantanida, T.P. , Eddy, R.L. , Shows, T.B. , & Hogness, D.S. (1986a).Molecular genetics of inherited variation in human color vision.Science 232,203–210. · DOI
  17. Shevell, S.K. & He, J.C. (1992).Dual Rayleigh-like color matches sensitive to individualdifferences in cone photopigments.Advances in Color Vision: Journal of the Optical Society ofAmerica, Technical Digest Series 4,20–22.
  18. Neitz, J. , Carroll, J. , Yamauchi, Y. , Neitz, M. , & Williams, D.R. (2002).Color perception in mediated by a plastic neural mechanism that isadjustable in adults.Neuron 35,783–792. · DOI
  19. Karnik, S.S. & Khorana, H.G. (1990).Assembly of functional rhodopsin requires a disulfide bond betweencysteine residues 110 and 187.Journal of Biological Chemistry 265,17520–17524. · DOI
  20. Neitz, M. , Bollinger, K. , & Neitz, J. (2003).Middle wavelength sensitive photopigment gene expression is absent indeuteranomalous colour vision. InNormal and Defective Colour Vision, ed. Mollon, J.D. , Knoblauch, K. & Pokorny, J. , pp.318–327.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press. · DOI · Paper page
  21. Sharpe, L.T. , Stockman, A. , Jägle, H. , Knau, H. , Klausen, G. , Reitner, A. , & Nathans, J. (1998).Red, green, and red–green hybrid pigments in the humanretina: Correlations between deduced protein sequences andpsychophysically measured spectral sensitivities.Journal of Neuroscience 18,10053–10069. · DOI
  22. McMahon, C. , Neitz, J. , & Neitz, M. (2003).Comparison of human and monkey pigment gene promoters to evaluateDNA sequences proposed to govern L:M cone ratio. InNormal and Defective Colour Vision, ed. Mollon, J.D. , Knoblauch, K. & Pokorny, J. ,pp.51–59.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press. · DOI
  23. Merbs, S.L. & Nathans, J. (1993).Role of hydroxyl-bearing amino acids in differentially tuning theabsorption spectra of the human red and green cone pigments.Photochemistry and Photobiology 58,706–710. · DOI
  24. Sjoberg, S.A. , Neitz, M. , Balding, S.D. , & Neitz, J. (1998).L-cone pigment genes expressed in normal colour vision.Vision Research 38,3213–3219. · DOI
  25. Neitz, J. , Neitz, M. , & Kainz, P.M. (1996).Visual pigment gene structure and the severity of human colorvision defects.Science 274,801–804. · DOI · Paper page
  26. Carroll, J. , Neitz, M. , & Neitz, J. (2002).Estimates of L:M cone ratio from ERG flicker photometry andgenetics.Journal of Vision 2,531–542. · DOI · Paper page
  27. Neitz, M. , Neitz, J. , & Jacobs, G.H. (1995).Genetic basis of photopigment variations in human dichromats.Vision Research 35,2095–2103. · DOI
  28. Neitz, M. & Neitz, J. (2001).A new test for mass screening of school age children forred–green color vision defects.Color Research and Application 26,S239–S249. · DOI
  29. Kainz, P.M. , Neitz, M. , & Neitz, J. (1998).Molecular genetic detection of female carriers of protan defects.Vision Research 38,3365–3369. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
NEITZ, M., CARROLL, J., RENNER, A., KNAU, H., WERNER, J. S., & NEITZ, J.
Venue
Visual Neuroscience
Published
2004-05
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
205-216
ISSN
  • 0952-5238
  • 1469-8714
Cited by
56
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review