Cited by 82Wildlife Ecology and ConservationAnimal Ecology and Behavior StudiesPlant and animal studies

Diet of the maned wolf, Chrysocyon brachyurus (Mammalia: Canidae), during wet and dry seasons at Ibitipoca State Park, Brazil

Aragona, M., Setz, E. Z. F.·2001·Journal of Zoology

Abstract

Analysis of 141 scats of maned wolf Chrysocyon brachyurus collected in a region of upland forest and meadows of south‐eastern Brazil yielded 351 food items in the wet season (60 scats) and 407 in the dry season (81 scats). Scarabaeidae and rodents were the most frequent animal food in both seasons, complemented by birds in the wet season and unidentified mammals in the dry season. Seeds revealed Solanum lycocarpum to be the most frequent plant food in the dry season and an Annonaceae and a Cactaceae the most frequent in the wet season. A total of 33 seed morphospecies were retrieved. Although our results reveal some shared and some divergent trends from dietary studies undertaken in savanna (‘cerrado’) areas, we found a very high frequency of potentially harmful tourists' garbage. This highlights the necessity for better environmental education and confirms that the maned wolf is a generalist and opportunist omnivore.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0952836901000620

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Such opportunistic feeding behavior has been previously reported.

    “such opportunistic feeding behavior has been previously reported.”

    From Digestive anatomy and diet of free-ranging maned wolf (Chrysocyon brachyurus) (2025) · cites this paper as Aragona and Setz (2001)

  • The gastrointestinal tract of canids is comparable to that of other Carnivora; it is not very complex and relatively short, with a simple stomach, a small cecum, and an unsacculated colon.

    “The gastrointestinal tract of canids is comparable to that of other Carnivora; it is not very complex and relatively short, with a simple stomach, a small cecum, and an unsacculated colon (Dietz 1985;Motta-Junior et al. 1996;Aragona and Setz 2001;Santos et al. 2003;De Almeida Jácomo et al. 2004;Motta-Junior et al. 2013).”

    From Digestive anatomy and diet of free-ranging maned wolf (Chrysocyon brachyurus) (2025) · cites this paper as Aragona and Setz 2001

  • The diet of maned wolves is known to be highly seasonal, given the difference in abundance of dietary items across the year.

    “The diet of maned wolves is known to be highly seasonal, given the difference in abundance of dietary items across the year (Dietz 1984;Aragona and Setz 2001;Silva and Talamoni 2003).”

    From Digestive anatomy and diet of free-ranging maned wolf (Chrysocyon brachyurus) (2025) · cites this paper as Aragona and Setz 2001

  • Most dietary analyses of maned wolves' diet are based on feces, a method most suitable for free-ranging individuals since it is not invasive and fecal material is relatively easy to access.

    “Most dietary analyses of maned wolves' diet are based on feces, a method most suitable for free-ranging individuals since it is not invasive and fecal material is relatively easy to access (Dietz 1984;Motta-Junior et al. 1996;;Aragona and Setz 2001).”

    From Digestive anatomy and diet of free-ranging maned wolf (Chrysocyon brachyurus) (2025) · cites this paper as Aragona and Setz 2001

  • The relative importance of dietary items is seasonal and dependent on the habitat of the individuals.

    “However, the relative importance of dietary items is seasonal and dependent on the habitat of the individuals (Dietz 1985;Aragona and Setz 2001;Motta-Junior et al. 2013).”

    From Digestive anatomy and diet of free-ranging maned wolf (Chrysocyon brachyurus) (2025) · cites this paper as Aragona and Setz 2001

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aragona, M., & Setz, E. Z. F.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) (BR)
  • Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR)
Corresponding author
Aragona, M.
Venue
Journal of Zoology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-05
Volume
254
Issue
1
Pages
131-136
ISSN
  • 0952-8369 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7998
OpenAlex
W2000462266
Cited by
82
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Zoology (publishedVersion)
  • Acervo Digital da Universidade Estadual Paulista (Universidade Estadual Paulista) (submittedVersion)
  • UNESP Institutional Repository (São Paulo State University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant and animal studies
Keywords
maned wolf, diet, scat analysis, seasonal variation, dry and rainy seasons, Scarabaeidae, rodents, birds, seeds, Solanum lycocarpum, Annonaceae, Cactaceae, omnivory, generalist diet, Ibitipoca State Park

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review