Cited by 113Wildlife Ecology and ConservationAnimal Ecology and Behavior StudiesPrimate Behavior and Ecology

Diet of the maned wolf, Chrysocyon brachyurus, in central Brazil

Motta‐Junior, J. C., Talamoni, S. A., Lombardi, J. A., Simokomaki, K.·1996·Journal of Zoology

Abstract

Analysis of 105 scats of the maned wolf (Chrysocyon brachyurus) collected in central Brazil yielded 304 occurrences of food items of which fruits of Solanum lycocarpum, rodents, and birds accounted for 61.5%. By analysis of minimum number of individual animals, rodents and birds were 75% of a total of 156 prey. On the other hand, fruits of S. lycocarpum and armadillos (Dasypus spp.) were the bulk of the total estimated biomass consumption, yielding 63.7% in a total of 73.5 kg. Rodents were mostly captured during the dry season, while miscellaneous fruits were consumed mostly in the wet season. The consumption of S. lycocarpum fruits and armadillos was aseasonal. Small rodents were taken in about the ranks of abundance in the study area, but S. lycocarpum fruits were actively searched by maned wolves, for its occurrence is limited to secondary savanna. Prey and fruits typical of savanna (‘cerrado’) and grassland (‘campo’) were the bulk of species, occurrences, prey numbers, and biomass consumed. These findings reinforce the importance of conservation of cerrado and campo in central Brazil. Despite maned wolf being a vulnerable species, its feeding habits are opportunistic, and the main reasons for its decline are likely to be habitat destruction and human disturbance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1996.tb05284.x

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most dietary analyses of maned wolves' diet are based on feces, a method most suitable for free-ranging individuals since it is not invasive and fecal material is relatively easy to access.

    “Most dietary analyses of maned wolves' diet are based on feces, a method most suitable for free-ranging individuals since it is not invasive and fecal material is relatively easy to access (Dietz 1984;Motta-Junior et al. 1996;;Aragona and Setz 2001).”

    From Digestive anatomy and diet of free-ranging maned wolf (Chrysocyon brachyurus) (2025) · cites this paper as Motta-Junior et al. 1996

  • Wolf's fruit (S. lycocarpum) is reported as the most important item in the diet, and it is generally the most consumed plant.

    “Yet, wolf`s fruit (S. lycocarpum) is reported as the most important item in the diet, and it is generally the most consumed plant (Dietz1984; Motta-Junior et al. 1996;Motta-Junior and Martins 2002;Santos et al. 2003;De Almeida Jácomo et al. 2004).”

    From Digestive anatomy and diet of free-ranging maned wolf (Chrysocyon brachyurus) (2025) · cites this paper as Motta-Junior et al. 1996

  • The gastrointestinal tract of canids is comparable to that of other Carnivora; it is not very complex and relatively short, with a simple stomach, a small cecum, and an unsacculated colon.

    “The gastrointestinal tract of canids is comparable to that of other Carnivora; it is not very complex and relatively short, with a simple stomach, a small cecum, and an unsacculated colon (Dietz 1985;Motta-Junior et al. 1996;Aragona and Setz 2001;Santos et al. 2003;De Almeida Jácomo et al. 2004;Motta-Junior et al. 2013).”

    From Digestive anatomy and diet of free-ranging maned wolf (Chrysocyon brachyurus) (2025) · cites this paper as Motta-Junior et al. 1996

  • Most vertebrates consumed by maned wolves are of medium and small size.

    “It has been reported that most vertebrates consumed by maned wolves are of medium and small size (Dietz 1984;Motta-Junior et al. 1996;Aragona and Setz 2001);”

    From Digestive anatomy and diet of free-ranging maned wolf (Chrysocyon brachyurus) (2025) · cites this paper as Motta-Junior et al. 1996

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Motta‐Junior, J. C., Talamoni, S. A., Lombardi, J. A., & Simokomaki, K.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal de São Carlos (BR)
  • Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR)
Venue
Journal of Zoology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1996-10
Volume
240
Issue
2
Pages
277-284
ISSN
  • 0952-8369 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7998
OpenAlex
W2027673112
Cited by
113
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
FWCI
0.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Zoology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
Keywords
maned wolf, diet, scat analysis, Solanum lycocarpum, fruit feeding, armadillos, Dasypus, rodents, birds, seasonal variation, opportunistic feeding, savanna, Cerrado, Campos, habitat conservation, Central Brazil

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review