Prey abundance and food habit of tigers (Panthera tigris tigris) in Pench National Park, Madhya Pradesh, India
Abstract
Food habits of tigers Panthera tigris and population attributes of prey species (population structure, density and biomass) were studied in the tropical dry deciduous forest of Pench National Park, Central India, from November 1998 to April 1999. Scat analysis and line transect method were used to estimate tiger food habits and density of major prey species, respectively. The 61.1 km 2 intensive study area was found to have very high ungulate density (90.3 animals km−2) with chital Axis axis being the most common species (80.7 animals km−2), followed by sambar Cervus unicolor (6.1 animals km−2). Common langur Presbytis entellus was the most abundant (77.2 animals km−2) primate species. When the density figures were multiplied by the average weight of each prey species, a high biomass density of 6013.25 kg km−2 was obtained for the intensive study area. Chital (47.3%) along with sambar (14.5%) and wild pig Sus scrofa (10.9%) constituted the major part of the tiger's diet. If there is food choice, tigers seem to kill medium‐ and large‐sized species more often. Wild pig and sambar were consumed more than their availability, whereas chital were taken in proportion to their availability. Gaur Bos gaurus and nilgai Bosephalus tragocamelus were not represented in the tiger's diet. Common langur was consumed in lesser proportion by tigers than expected by estimates of its density. The average weight of animals consumed by tigers in the intensive study area was 82.1 kg. The analyses revealed that Pench harbours very high prey density and tigers are mostly dependent on the wild ungulates rather than on domestic livestock as is the case in many other areas in the Indian subcontinent. These two factors thus make Pench National Park a potential area for long‐term conservation of tigers.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The population density of B. gaurus in Pench National Park, central India, was 0.3 (0.1-1.1, 95% CI) in 1998-1999.
“Densities of 0.7 (± 0.2 SE) in the mid-1990s (Karanth and Nichols 1998) and densities of 0.3 (0.1-1.1, 95% CI) in 1998-1999 (Biswas and Sankar 2002) were recorded in Pench National Park, central India.”
From Bos frontalis and Bos gaurus (Artiodactyla: Bovidae) (2018) · cites this paper as Biswas and Sankar 2002
Cites
Estimation of tiger densities in India using photographic captures and recaptures
Karanth, K. U., & Nichols, J. D. (1998) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[2852:eotdii]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,176 · cited 4× · see citing works
“The only other available estimate of prey density from Pench is that of Karanth & Nichols (1998).”
BackgroundInfluentialLARGE MAMMALIAN PREY AND PREDATORS IN BANDIPUR INDIA
Johnsingh, A. J. T. (1983) · Bombay Natural History Society · doi:10.5281/zenodo.13474739 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Prey preference of large carnivores in Anamalai Tiger Reserve, India
Kumaraguru, A., Saravanamuthu, R., Brinda, K., & Asokan, S. (2011) · European Journal of Wildlife Research · doi:10.1007/s10344-010-0473-y · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Bos frontalis and Bos gaurus (Artiodactyla: Bovidae)
Ahrestani, F. S. (2018) · Mammalian Species · doi:10.1093/mspecies/sey004 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
- Authors
- Biswas, S., & Sankar, K.
- Affiliations
- Wildlife Institute of India (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Biswas, S.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Zoology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-03
- Volume
- 256
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 411-420
- ISSN
- 0952-8369 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7998
- OpenAlex
- W2094150076
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 2.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Zoology (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Fish and Wildlife Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
- Keywords
- Panthera tigris tigris, prey abundance, prey density, prey biomass, food choice, chital, Axis axis, sambar, wild pigs, ungulate prey, tiger conservation, tropical dry deciduous forest, scat analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review