Cited by 167Wildlife Ecology and ConservationAnimal Ecology and Behavior StudiesRangeland and Wildlife Management

Prey abundance and food habit of tigers (Panthera tigris tigris) in Pench National Park, Madhya Pradesh, India

Biswas, S., Sankar, K.·2002·Journal of Zoology

Abstract

Food habits of tigers Panthera tigris and population attributes of prey species (population structure, density and biomass) were studied in the tropical dry deciduous forest of Pench National Park, Central India, from November 1998 to April 1999. Scat analysis and line transect method were used to estimate tiger food habits and density of major prey species, respectively. The 61.1 km 2 intensive study area was found to have very high ungulate density (90.3 animals km−2) with chital Axis axis being the most common species (80.7 animals km−2), followed by sambar Cervus unicolor (6.1 animals km−2). Common langur Presbytis entellus was the most abundant (77.2 animals km−2) primate species. When the density figures were multiplied by the average weight of each prey species, a high biomass density of 6013.25 kg km−2 was obtained for the intensive study area. Chital (47.3%) along with sambar (14.5%) and wild pig Sus scrofa (10.9%) constituted the major part of the tiger's diet. If there is food choice, tigers seem to kill medium‐ and large‐sized species more often. Wild pig and sambar were consumed more than their availability, whereas chital were taken in proportion to their availability. Gaur Bos gaurus and nilgai Bosephalus tragocamelus were not represented in the tiger's diet. Common langur was consumed in lesser proportion by tigers than expected by estimates of its density. The average weight of animals consumed by tigers in the intensive study area was 82.1 kg. The analyses revealed that Pench harbours very high prey density and tigers are mostly dependent on the wild ungulates rather than on domestic livestock as is the case in many other areas in the Indian subcontinent. These two factors thus make Pench National Park a potential area for long‐term conservation of tigers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0952836902000456

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The population density of B. gaurus in Pench National Park, central India, was 0.3 (0.1-1.1, 95% CI) in 1998-1999.

    “Densities of 0.7 (± 0.2 SE) in the mid-1990s (Karanth and Nichols 1998) and densities of 0.3 (0.1-1.1, 95% CI) in 1998-1999 (Biswas and Sankar 2002) were recorded in Pench National Park, central India.”

    From Bos frontalis and Bos gaurus (Artiodactyla: Bovidae) (2018) · cites this paper as Biswas and Sankar 2002

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Biswas, S., & Sankar, K.
Affiliations
Wildlife Institute of India (IN)
Corresponding author
Biswas, S.
Venue
Journal of Zoology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-03
Volume
256
Issue
3
Pages
411-420
ISSN
  • 0952-8369 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7998
OpenAlex
W2094150076
Cited by
167
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 10
FWCI
2.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Zoology (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Fish and Wildlife Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
Keywords
Panthera tigris tigris, prey abundance, prey density, prey biomass, food choice, chital, Axis axis, sambar, wild pigs, ungulate prey, tiger conservation, tropical dry deciduous forest, scat analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review