The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Regional diversity in social perceptions of (ing)
Abstract
This article examines the perception of the (ing) variants, [ɪŋ] and [ɪn], in three regionally distinct localities in Britain: London in the South of England; Manchester in the North; and Edinburgh in Scotland. Data was gathered in perceptual tests in which respondents from each location rated stimuli doublets, each containing only one of the variants of (ing), on multiple social attribute scales. In London and Manchester, the perception of [ɪŋ] and [ɪn] broadly matches findings made for the United States in that speakers using [ɪŋ] are considered more articulate and hardworking, and less casual than speakers using [ɪn]. In Edinburgh, results are markedly different. We argue that these differences are due to a combination of factors that include the historical development of (ing) in a particular locale, which led to differences in production, variations in language ideology and, as a result, class-specific evaluations that appear to be regionally dependent.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A large body of work has already established the influence of variable (ING) on social evaluation (Campbell-Kibler, 2005;Schleef et al., 2017).”
From Swear(ING) ain't play(ING): The interaction of taboo language and the sociolinguistic variable (2023) · cites this paper as Schleef et al., 2017
In the citing paper
“It has been suggested that the alveolar [ɪn] variant activates social meanings related to lower intelligence, speakers in lower socioeconomic groups, and more casual speech in both the USA (Campbell-Kibler, 2005) and the UK (Schleef et al., 2017).”
From Swear(ING) ain't play(ING): The interaction of taboo language and the sociolinguistic variable (2023) · cites this paper as Schleef et al., 2017
In the citing paper
“this had been shown to be true for neutral words (Campbell-Kibler, 2005;Schleef et al., 2017)”
From Swear(ING) ain't play(ING): The interaction of taboo language and the sociolinguistic variable (2023) · cites this paper as Schleef et al., 2017
In the citing paper
“Unlike Schleef et al., variable (ING) had no effect on the scales hard-working or casual.”
From Swear(ING) ain't play(ING): The interaction of taboo language and the sociolinguistic variable (2023) · cites this paper as Schleef et al. (2017)
In the citing paper
“In Schleef et al. (2017), (ING) variation was shown to influence perceptions of scales of articulate, hardworking, posh, rich, working class, casual, and educated for speakers with London accents.”
From Swear(ING) ain't play(ING): The interaction of taboo language and the sociolinguistic variable (2023) · cites this paper as Schleef et al. (2017)
In the citing paper
“This replicates the finding of Schleef et al. (2017) that, in a London accent, variable (ING) can influence how speakers are socially evaluated on social class-and education-related scales.”
From Swear(ING) ain't play(ING): The interaction of taboo language and the sociolinguistic variable (2023) · cites this paper as Schleef et al. (2017)
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 47
- 10.1177/0023830910372489 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0954394509000052 · DOI
- 10.1016/0749-5978(88)90028-3 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00374.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/S0954394500000120 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jebo.2011.08.009 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1075/veaw.g20 · DOI
- Watts Emma . (2005). Mobility-induced dialect contact: A sociolinguistic investigation of speech variation in Wilmslow, Cheshire. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Essex.
- 10.1525/ae.1989.16.2.02a00040 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1467-9841.2011.00504.x · DOI
- Visser, 1966, An historical syntax of the English language. Part two: syntactical units with one verb
- Lippi-Green, 2012, English with an accent: Language, ideology, and discrimination in the United States, 10.4324/9780203348802 · DOI
- 10.1177/0261927X8500400203 · DOI
- 10.1075/eww.32.2.04sch · DOI
- 10.1215/00031283-2007-002 · DOI
- Mathisen, 1999, Urban voices: Accent studies in the British Isles, 107
- Preston, 2010, Empirische Evidenzen und theoretische Passungen sprachlicher Variation, 7
- 10.1017/S0954394514000088 · DOI
- 10.1177/070674379403900303 · DOI
- Tagliamonte, 2002, The handbook of language variation and change, 729
- 10.1017/CBO9780511611759 · DOI
- Labov, 2001, Principles of linguistic change: Social factors
- Jesperson, 1961, A Modern English grammar on historical perspectives. Part I: sounds and spellings
- Dörnyei, 2003, Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration and processing
- 10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/04716-7 · DOI
- Houston Ann . (1985). Continuity and change in English morphology: The variable (ing). Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
- 10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00351.x · DOI
- Moore, 1935, Middle English dialect characteristics and dialect boundaries
- Reid, 1978, Sociolinguistic patterns in British English, 158
- Chirrey, 1999, Urban voices: Accent studies in the British Isles, 223
- 10.1075/eww.36.1.04sch · DOI
- 10.1017/S0954394510000177 · DOI
- Tagliamonte, 2004, Language variation in Europe, 390
- Görlach, 2002, A textual history of Scots
- Trudgill, 1974, The social differentiation of English in Norwich
- 10.1037/0033-2909.83.2.314 · DOI
- Kroskrity, 2004, A companion to linguistic anthropology, 496
- Schleef, 2015, Language variation: European perspectives V, 197
- 10.1177/0075424214531487 · DOI
- Aitken, 1979, The languages of Scotland, 85
- Mees Inger . (1977). Language and social class in Cardiff: A survey of the speech habits of schoolchildren. M.A. dissertation, Leiden University.
- Labov, 1972, Sociolinguistic patterns
- 10.1146/annurev-anthro-092611-145828 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/S0954394500000594 · DOI
- Romaine, 1984, The language of children and adolescents
- Meyerhoff, 2013, Sociolinguistic perspectives on Scotland, 103
- 10.1017/S0047404513000857 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Swear(ING) ain't play(ING): The interaction of taboo language and the sociolinguistic variable
Hunt, M., Cotter, C., Pearson, H., & Stockall, L. (2023) · Journal of Sociolinguistics · doi:10.1111/josl.12588 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Schleef, E., Flynn, N., & Barras, W.
- Venue
- Language Variation and Change
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2017-03
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 29-56
- ISSN
- 0954-3945
- 1469-8021
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
