CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 38

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The dynamic interaction between lexical and contextual frequency: A case study of (ING)

Forrest, Jon·2017·Language Variation and Change
DOI 10.1017/s0954394517000072
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

To identify how contextual usage frequency and lexical frequency interact when controlling for traditional linguistic constraints, this study analyzes the effect of frequency on (ING), taking into account a word's frequent context of occurrence. The data consist of 13,167 tokens of (ING) from interviews with 132 speakers conducted in Raleigh, North Carolina. Results from mixed-effect logistic regression show a strong effect of frequency on the realization of (ING), and this effect interacts with phonological context of occurrence. Frequent occurrence in environments that favor-in amplify the effect of lexical frequency; conversely, frequent occurrence in environments that favor–ing dampen the effect of overall frequency. Frequency also interacts with year of birth, showing an entrenchment of high-frequency words, lagging behind the community change toward the–ing variant in apparent time. Overall, these findings support the usage-based position of frequency effects as the result of a dynamic interplay between context of use and cognitive systems.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0954394517000072

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

  • Stuffed toys and speech perception

    Hay, J., & Drager, K. (2010) · Linguistics · doi:10.1515/ling.2010.027 · Cited by 368 · cited 1×

    “…results have been replicated with different social priming mechanisms and different linguistic variables; social priming affects linguistic perception of the /ɪ/ vowel by New Zealanders (Hay, Nolan, & Drager, 2006) and encourages classification into a primed social category (Hay & Drager, 2010).”
    Result

Research works printed but not linked: 73

  1. Tamminga Meredith J. (2014). Persistence in the production of linguistic variation. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
  2. Wolfram, 1976, Appalachian speech
  3. 10.1515/TLR.2006.014 · DOI
  4. 2017, R: A language and environment for statistical computing
  5. Prince, 2008, Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar
  6. Houston Ann . (1985). Continuity and change in English morphology: The variable (ING) . Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
  7. Dinkin, 2008, The real effect of word frequency on phonetic variation, University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 14, 97
  8. 10.1353/lan.0.0035 · DOI
  9. 10.1017/S1360674311000153 · DOI
  10. 10.1017/S0954394516000119 · DOI
  11. Raymond, 2012, Are effects of word frequency effects of context of use? An analysis of initial fricative reduction in Spanish, Frequency Effects in Language Learning and Processing, 1, 35, 10.1515/9783110274059.35 · DOI
  12. Thomas, 2010, Sociophonetics: An introduction
  13. 10.2307/413643 · DOI
  14. 10.1017/S0954394512000105 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.tics.2005.04.002 · DOI
  16. Bates, 2017, Package ‘lme4’
  17. 10.1017/S0954394512000099 · DOI
  18. Poplack, 2000, The grammaticization of going to in (African American) English, Language Variation and Change, 11, 315, 10.1017/S0954394599113048 · DOI
  19. Labov, 2001, Social factors
  20. 10.1075/tsl.9 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Tagliamonte, 2004, Someth [in]’s go [ing] on!: Variable ing at ground zero, Language Variation in Europe: Papers from ICLAVE, 2, 390
  22. 10.1057/9781137291448 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.02.012 · DOI
  24. 10.3758/BF03200655 · DOI
  25. Labov, 1972, Sociolinguistic patterns
  26. 10.1038/nature06137 · DOI
  27. Labov, 2010, Cognitive and cultural factors
  28. Pierrehumbert, 2002, Word-specific phonetics, Laboratory Phonology, 7, 101
  29. 10.1146/annurev-linguistics-030514-125050 · DOI
  30. 10.1017/S0954394511000135 · DOI
  31. Fischer, 1958, Social influences on the choice of a linguistic variant, Word-Journal of the International Linguistic Association, 14, 47
  32. 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.06.013 · DOI
  33. 10.1515/ling.1988.26.4.641 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.wocn.2005.10.001 · DOI
  35. 10.1017/S0954394505050118 · DOI
  36. Wald, 1985, Language: Introductory readings, 219
  37. Dodsworth, 2013, Retreat from the Southern Vowel Shift in Raleigh, NC: Social factors, University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 19, 31
  38. 10.1017/S0022226706004191 · DOI
  39. 10.3758/BRM.41.4.977 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2007.02.002 · DOI
  41. 10.1075/dia.29.2.02bro · DOI
  42. 10.1017/S0954394512000142 · DOI
  43. 10.1017/S0954394510000220 · DOI
  44. Francis, 1982, Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar
  45. 10.1075/slcs.41.12byb · DOI
  46. Johnson, 1997, Talker Variability in Speech Processing, 145
  47. Reid, 1978, Sociolinguistic Patterns in British English, 158
  48. Koops, 2008, The effect of perceived speaker age on the perception of PIN and PEN vowels in Houston, Texas, University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 14, 93
  49. Rácz, 2015, The Handbook of Language Emergence, 123, 10.1002/9781118346136.ch5 · DOI
  50. 10.1353/lan.2012.0050 · DOI
  51. Baayen, 1996, Celex2
  52. 10.1006/jmla.2001.2834 · DOI
  53. Guy, 2007, Lexical exceptions in variable phonology, University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 13, 109
  54. Cofer Thomas . (1972). Linguistic variability in a Philadelphia community . Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
  55. 10.1177/0049124104268644 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.1017/S0954394500000429 · DOI
  57. 10.1109/ASRU.2011.6163980 · DOI
  58. Shuy, 1968, Linguistic correlates of social stratification in Detroit speech
  59. 10.1353/lan.2016.0036 · DOI
  60. 10.1075/tsl.45.08pie · DOI
  61. 10.1017/S0954394502143018 · DOI
  62. 10.1515/9783110167467 · DOI
  63. 10.1353/lan.0.0110 · DOI
  64. 10.1353/lan.2006.0186 · DOI
  65. 10.1016/j.wocn.2006.06.003 · DOI
  66. Trudgill, 1974, The social differentiation of English in Norwich
  67. Labov, 1966, The social stratification of English in New York City
  68. 10.1017/CBO9780511750526 · DOI · Paper page
  69. 10.1017/S0954394500000533 · DOI
  70. 10.1017/S0954394516000041 · DOI
  71. 10.1017/S0954394515000137 · DOI
  72. Abramowicz, 2007, Sociolinguistics meets exemplar theory: Frequency and recency effects in (ing), University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 13, 27
  73. 10.1215/00031283-2008-008 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 38

Metadata

Authors
Forrest, J.
Venue
Language Variation and Change
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Published
2017-07
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
129-156
ISSN
  • 0954-3945
  • 1469-8021
DOI
10.1017/s0954394517000072
Cited by
38
References
1
Language
en
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified, 25 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review