The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Developmental pathways in disruptive child behavior
Abstract
Developmental sequences in disruptive behavior from childhood to adolescence are traced retrospectively and prospectively in two community samples of boys. Three developmental pathways are distinguished: (a) an early authority conflict pathway, consisting in sequence of stubborn behavior, defiance, and authority avoidance; (b) a covert pathway, consisting of minor covert behaviors, property damage, and moderate to serious forms of delinquency; and (c) an overt pathway, consisting of aggression, fighting, and violence. The overlap among the three disruptive pathways is examined. Those boys who escalated in the overt pathway were more likely to escalate in the covert pathway than boys escalating in the covert pathway showing an escalation in the overt pathway. Escalation in the authority conflict pathway was not associated with escalation in either the overt or the covert pathways. Boys' rate of self-reported delinquency was highest for those in triple pathways (covert-overt-authority conflict) or in certain dual pathways (covert-overt, covert-authority conflict). However, by age 16 the highest rate of offending was displayed by those in the triple pathways. The rate of violent offenses was also highest for those in the triple pathways and for those in the overt and covert pathways. Results from the rate for court petitions largely supported these findings. Lowest rates of offending were observed for boys in the overt and authority conflict pathways. Implications are discussed for clinical practice and future research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: a developmental taxonomy
Moffitt, T. E. (1993) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.100.4.674 · Cited by 9,987
Cited by
Oppositional Defiant and Conduct Disorder: A Review of the Past 10 Years, Part I
LOEBER, R., BURKE, J. D., LAHEY, B. B., WINTERS, A., & ZERA, M. (2000) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/00004583-200012000-00007 · Cited by 1,192
Self-citationParenting practices and child disruptive behavior problems in early elementary school
Stormshak, E. A., Bierman, K. L., McMahon, R. J., & Lengua, L. J. (2000) · Journal of Clinical Child Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15374424jccp2901_3 · Cited by 627
Developmental Trajectories of Externalizing Behaviors in Childhood and Adolescence
Bongers, I. L., Koot, H. M., Van Der Ende, J., & Verhulst, F. C. (2004) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00755.x · Cited by 576
Intervening in children's lives: An ecological, family-centered approach to mental health care.
Dishion, T. J., & Stormshak, E. A. (2007) · doi:10.1037/11485-000 · Cited by 476
Risk factors for persistent delinquent behavior among juveniles: A meta-analytic review
Assink, M., van der Put, C. E., Hoeve, M., de Vries, S. L. A., Stams, G. J. J. M., & Oort, F. J. (2015) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2015.08.002 · Cited by 338
Metadata
- Authors
- Loeber, R., Wung, P., Keenan, K., Giroux, B., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., Van Kammen, W. B., & Maugham, B.
- Venue
- Development and Psychopathology
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1993
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 103-133
- ISSN
- 0954-5794 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-2198
- OpenAlex
- W2101829852
- Cited by
- 582
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.