Cited by 1,192Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Oppositional Defiant and Conduct Disorder: A Review of the Past 10 Years, Part I

LOEBER, ROLF, BURKE, JEFFREY D., LAHEY, BENJAMIN B., WINTERS, ALAINA, ZERA, MARCIE·2000·Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective To review empirical findings on oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) and conduct disorder (CD).Method Selected summaries of the literature over the past decade are presented.Results Evidence supports a distinction between the symptoms of ODD and many symptoms of CD, but there is controversy about whether aggressive symptoms should be considered to be part of ODD or CD. CD is clearly heterogenous, but further research is needed regarding the most useful subtypes. Some progress has been made in documenting sex differences. Symptoms that are more serious, more atypical for the child's sex, or more age-atypical appear to be prognostic of serious dysfunction. Progress has been made in the methods for assessment of ODD and CD, but some critical issues, such as combined information from different informants, remains to be addressed. A proportion of children with ODD later develop CD, and a proportion of those with CD later meet criteria for antisocial personality disorder. ODD and CD frequently co-occur with other psychiatric conditions.Conclusions Although major advances in the study of the prevalence and course of ODD and CD have occurred in the past decade, some key issues remain unanswered.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00004583-200012000-00007

Cites

208 of 208 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
LOEBER, R., BURKE, J. D., LAHEY, B. B., WINTERS, A., & ZERA, M.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
LOEBER, ROLF
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-12
Volume
39
Issue
12
Pages
1468-1484
ISSN
0890-8567 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2095007892
Cited by
1,192
References
204
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 57 · 2017: 89 · 2016: 54 · 2015: 64 · 2014: 71 · 2013: 69 · 2012: 77
FWCI
4.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
NIMH (grant MH 42529, grant MH 50778)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
oppositional defiant disorder, conduct disorder, sex differences, prognosis, informant-based assessment, antisocial personality disorder, comorbidities, symptom heterogeneity, child and adolescent psychiatric disorders
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Humans, Male, Prognosis, Sex Factors, Comorbidity, Prevalence, Age of Onset, Conduct Disorder, Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review