The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The first two years of school: Teacher-child relationships and deflections in children's classroom adjustment
Abstract
Teacher reports of children's competence and problem behaviors are an important source of information on psychopathology. The school context is also an agent of developmental change. This study examines teacherchild relationships and deflections in child adjustment over the school-entry to grade 2 period in 436 children. The Student-Teacher Relationship Scale (STRS) was related to two indices of deflections in predicted child adjustment: (a) residual scores obtained from regressing teacher reports from grade 1 on kindergarten teacher reports, and (b) false positive predictions of retention or referral for special education in the K-l period. Children with whom kindergarten teachers reported a positive relationship were rated in spring of grade I as better adjusted than was predicted on the basis of identical ratings from the fall of the kindergarten year; the converse was also true. False-positive retention/referral predictions had more positive relationships with kindergarten teachers than did true positives. A second set of analyses examined second grade teacher ratings of child adjustment and child-teacher relationships in two groups of children with different child-teacher relationship histories in kindergarten. Children with warm, close, communicative relationships with kindergarten teachers were better adjusted and had more positive child-teacher relationships in second grade than those with angry, dependent child-teacher relationships in kindergarten. Results supported the view that children's relationships with teachers are an important component of adaptation in school, and that they can play a role in deflecting the course of development in the school context.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Achenbach, T. M., McConaughy, S. H., & Howell, C. T. (1987) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.101.2.213 · Cited by 5,436
Apprenticeship in Thinking: Cognitive Development in Social Context
Rogoff, B. (1990) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195059731.001.0001 · Cited by 4,709
Waters, E., & Deane, K. E. (1985) · Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development · doi:10.2307/3333826 · Cited by 1,144
Cited by
Jennings, P. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (2009) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654308325693 · Cited by 3,686
Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2001) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00301 · Cited by 3,307
Self-citationA Review of School Climate Research
Thapa, A., Cohen, J., Guffey, S., & Higgins-D’Alessandro, A. (2013) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654313483907 · Cited by 2,335
Learner-Centered Teacher-Student Relationships Are Effective: A Meta-Analysis
Cornelius-White, J. (2007) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/003465430298563 · Cited by 1,812
Enhancing relationships between children and teachers.
Pianta, R. C. (1999) · doi:10.1037/10314-000 · Cited by 1,782
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Pianta, R. C., Steinberg, M. S., & Rollins, K. B.
- Venue
- Development and Psychopathology
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1995
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 295-312
- ISSN
- 0954-5794 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-2198
- OpenAlex
- W2124768126
- Cited by
- 853
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 27.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The first two years of school: Teacher-child relationships and deflections in children's classroom adjustment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0954579400006519
- The paper
- Pianta, R. C., Steinberg, M. S., & Rollins, K. B. (1995). The first two years of school: Teacher-child relationships and deflections in children's classroom adjustment. Development and Psychopathology. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954579400006519
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.