The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A relational view of causality in normal and abnormal development
Abstract
An understanding of developmental phenomena demands a relational or coactive concept of causality, as opposed to a conceptualization that assumes that singular causes can act in isolation. In this article we present a developmental psychobiological systems view of relational (bidirectional, coactional) causality, in which it is proposed that developmental outcomes are a consequence of at least two specific components of coaction from the same or different levels of a developmental system. The levels are genetic, neural, behavioral, and environmental; the latter level includes the cultural, social, and physical aspects of an organism's environment. We show the applicability of this view to the understanding of the development of normal and abnormal behavioral and psychological phenotypes through illustrations from the existing animal and human literature. Finally, we discuss future possibilities and potential stumbling blocks in the implementation of a more fully realized bidirectional, coactional perspective in developmental psychopathological research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Equifinality and multifinality in developmental psychopathology
Cicchetti, D., & Rogosch, F. A. (1996) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579400007318 · Cited by 1,842 · cited 1×
“As docu-multifinality (Cicchetti, 1990, p. 18; Cicchetti & Rogosch, 1996; Richters, 1997).1 Be- mented previously (Gottlieb, 1976, 1997), experience can play at least four different rolescause these issues involve the relational view of causality espoused here, more needs to be in anatomical,…”
Background
Cited by
Brain development in children and adolescents: Insights from anatomical magnetic resonance imaging
Lenroot, R. K., & Giedd, J. N. (2006) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2006.06.001 · Cited by 1,863
Leekam, S. R., Prior, M. R., & Uljarevic, M. (2011) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0023341 · Cited by 612
Development and Psychopathology
Cicchetti, D. (2015) · Developmental Psychopathology · doi:10.1002/9780470939383.ch1 · Cited by 382
The Significance of Biology for Human Development: A Developmental Psychobiological Systems View
Gottlieb, G., Wahlsten, D., & Lickliter, R. (2007) · Handbook of Child Psychology · doi:10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0105 · Cited by 274
Self-citationCicchetti, D., Rogosch, F. A., & Sturge-Apple, M. L. (2007) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579407000600 · Cited by 204
Metadata
- Authors
- GOTTLIEB, G., & HALPERN, C. T.
- Venue
- Development and Psychopathology
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2002-08-20
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 421-435
- ISSN
- 0954-5794 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-2198
- OpenAlex
- W2149479092
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A relational view of causality in normal and abnormal development. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0954579402003024
- The paper
- GOTTLIEB, G., & HALPERN, C. T. (2002). A relational view of causality in normal and abnormal development. Development and Psychopathology. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954579402003024
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.