The DOI matches its Crossref record; 187 of the 187 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Language abilities in Williams syndrome: A critical review
Abstract
Williams syndrome is a rare genetic disorder in which, it is claimed, language abilities are relatively strong despite mild to moderate mental retardation. Such claims have, in turn, been interpreted as evidence either for modular preservation of language or for atypical constraints on cognitive development. However, this review demonstrates that there is, in fact, little evidence that syntax, morphology, phonology, or pragmatics are any better than predicted by nonverbal ability, although performance on receptive vocabulary tests is relatively good. Similarly, claims of an imbalance between good phonology and impaired or atypical lexical semantics are without strong support. There is, nevertheless, consistent evidence for specific deficits in spatial language that mirror difficulties in nonverbal spatial cognition, as well as some tentative evidence that early language acquisition proceeds atypically. Implications for modular and neuroconstructivist accounts of language development are discussed. The preparation of this paper was supported by the Williams Syndrome Foundation (United Kingdom) and the Medical Research Council. I thank Courtenay Norbury and Kate Nation for comments on the manuscript and Chris Jarrold, Jill Boucher, and Teresa McCormack for many useful discussions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ASPECTS OF THE THEORY OF SYNTAX
Chomsky, N. (1964) · doi:10.21236/ad0616323 · Cited by 13,587
On The Language Instinct: (412952005-009)
Pinker, S., & American Psychological Association (1994) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e412952005-009 · Cited by 5,646
The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?
Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N., & Fitch, W. T. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.298.5598.1569 · Cited by 5,189
The American Journal of Human Genetics
S., J. (1950) · Population (French Edition) · doi:10.2307/1523704 · Cited by 5,028
Cummins, R., & Fodor, J. (1985) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2184717 · Cited by 4,791
At home in the universe: the search for laws of self-organization and complexity
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-3294 · Cited by 2,871
Smith, T. L., & Chomsky, N. (1982) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2184681 · Cited by 2,808
The phonological loop as a language learning device.
Baddeley, A., Gathercole, S., & Papagno, C. (1998) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.105.1.158 · Cited by 2,199
Structure and Strategy in Learning to Talk
Nelson, K. (1973) · Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development · doi:10.2307/1165788 · Cited by 1,881
Development itself is the key to understanding developmental disorders
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1998) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(98)01230-3 · Cited by 1,299
Cited by
Costanzo, F., Varuzza, C., Menghini, D., Addona, F., Gianesini, T., & Vicari, S. (2013) · Research in Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2013.01.024 · Cited by 200
Järvinen-Pasley, A., Bellugi, U., Reilly, J., MILLS, D. L., Galaburda, A., Reiss, A. L., & Korenberg, J. R. (2008) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579408000011 · Cited by 177
An event related potential study of inhibitory and attentional control in Williams syndrome adults
Greer, J. M. H., Hamilton, C., McMullon, M. E. G., Riby, D. M., & Riby, L. M. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0170180 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- BROCK, J.
- Venue
- Development and Psychopathology
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 01
- Pages
- 97-127
- ISSN
- 0954-5794 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-2198
- OpenAlex
- W2166051244
- Cited by
- 323
- References
- 187
- FWCI
- 5.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Language abilities in Williams syndrome: A critical review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s095457940707006x
- The paper
- BROCK, J. (2007). Language abilities in Williams syndrome: A critical review. Development and Psychopathology. https://doi.org/10.1017/s095457940707006x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.