Cited by 200Williams Syndrome ResearchDown syndrome and intellectual disability researchDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Executive functions in intellectual disabilities: a comparison between Williams syndrome and down syndrome.

Costanzo, Floriana, Varuzza, Cristiana, Menghini, Deny, Addona, Francesca, Gianesini, Tiziana, Vicari, Stefano·2013·Research in Developmental Disabilities

Abstract

Executive functions are a set of high cognitive abilities that control and regulate other functions and behaviors and are crucial for successful adaptation. Deficits in executive functions are frequently described in developmental disorders, which are characterized by disadaptive behavior. However, executive functions are not widely examined in individuals with intellectual disability. The present study is aimed at evaluating the etiological specificity hypotheses pertaining to executive functions by comparing individuals with intellectual disability of different etiology, as Williams syndrome and Down syndrome, on different aspects of executive functions. To this aim a battery evaluating attention, short-term and working memory, planning, categorization, shifting and inhibition, was administered to 15 children, adolescents and adults with Williams syndrome, to 15 children, adolescents and adults with Down syndrome and to 16 mental-age-matched typically developing children. The two groups with intellectual disability showed impairment in a set of executive functions, as auditory sustained attention, visual selective attention, visual categorization and working memory, and preserved visual sustained attention, auditory selective attention and visual inhibition. However, a distinctive profile has been found between the two syndromic groups on other executive functions. While participants with Down syndrome were poor in shifting and verbal aspects of memory and inhibition, those…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.01.024

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The intellectual disability in Down syndrome presents with predominant deficits in executive functioning and memory.

    “It presents as a range of impairments including predominant deficits in executive functioning and memory (Vicari et al., 2005, 2000; Lanfranchi et al., 2010; Costanzo et al., 2013; Grieco et al., 2015).”

    From Neurodevelopment in Down syndrome: Concordance in humans and models (2022) · cites this paper as Costanzo et al., 2013

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Costanzo, F., Varuzza, C., Menghini, D., Addona, F., Gianesini, T., & Vicari, S.
Affiliations
  • Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital (IT)
  • Libera Università Maria SS. Assunta (IT)
Corresponding author
Vicari, Stefano
Venue
Research in Developmental Disabilities
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-05
Volume
34
Issue
5
Pages
1770-1780
ISSN
0891-4222 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2091318908
Cited by
200
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3
FWCI
4.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Research in Developmental Disabilities (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Williams Syndrome Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
executive function, Williams syndrome, Down syndrome, intellectual disability, attention, working memory, short-term memory, planning, cognitive flexibility, inhibition, categorization, cognitive development
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Attention, Child, Cognition, Down Syndrome, Female, Humans, Intelligence, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Intellectual Disability, Neuropsychological Tests, Williams Syndrome, Young Adult, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review