Cited by 71Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesYouth, Drugs, and ViolenceCrime Patterns and Interventions

Sibling influences on adolescent substance use: The role of modeling, collusion, and conflict

Open access
Low, Sabina, Shortt, Joann Wu, Snyder, James·2012·Development and Psychopathology

Abstract

The longitudinal associations of older sibling substance use as well as dyadic sibling conflict and collusion to younger sibling substance use were examined in a community-based sample of 244 same-sex sibling pairs. Indirect effects of older siblings on younger sibling substance use were hypothesized via younger sibling deviant peer affiliation and conflict with friends. Adolescents, parents, friends, and teachers completed measures of substance use, conflict, and deviant peer involvement. Observational data were used for both measures of collusion and conflict. Findings suggest that older sibling substance use has a direct effect on younger sibling use, but relationship dynamics and reinforcement played a significant role as well. Specifically, collusion and conflict in the sibling relationship both had indirect effects through younger siblings’ deviant peer affiliation. Findings validate the powerful socializing role of both siblings and peers, and elucidate the complex mechanisms through which socialization occurs. Furthermore, data underscore the importance of considering how multiple dimensions of socialization operate in the elaboration of antisocial behavior.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0954579411000836

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Role models, especially parents and siblings, significantly impact substance use patterns, with lack of parental supervision being a key risk factor.

    “Role models, especially parents and siblings, significantly impact substance use patterns, with lack of parental supervision being a key risk factor [78, 79].”

    From Prevalence and patterns of substance use in West Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2024) · cites this paper as [78]

    The Discussion describes older siblings as role models whose substance use may influence younger siblings’ use. The Limitations section says parenting behavior was not included in the model and only suggests that poor parental monitoring might contribute; it does not establish lack of parental supervision as a key risk factor. Page numbers were not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Patterson GR Bank L Gunnar MR Thelen E Some amplifying mechanisms for pathologic processes in families Systems and development: The Minnesota symposia on child psychology 1989 Vol. 22 167 209 Erlbaum Hillsdale, NJ
  2. Steinberg L Dahl R Keating D Kupfer DS Masten A Pine DS Cicchetti D Cohen DJ The study of developmental psychopathology in adolescence: Integrating affective neuroscience with the study of context Developmental psychopathology: Vol. 2. Developmental neuroscience 2006 710 741 Wiley Hoboken, NJ 2nd ed
  3. Straus MA Hamby SL Boney-McCoy S Sugarman DB The revised conflict tactics scales (CTS2) Journal of Family Issues 1996 17 283 316

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Low, S., Shortt, J. W., & Snyder, J.
Affiliations
  • Wichita State University (US)
  • Oregon Social Learning Center (US)
Corresponding author
Low, Sabina
Venue
Development and Psychopathology
Published
2012-01-31
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
287-300
ISSN
  • 0954-5794 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-2198
OpenAlex
W2086267338
Cited by
71
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Development and Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Holmes Museum Of Anthropology (Wichita State University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH058337, R01 MH 58337)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Youth, Drugs, and Violence
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
Keywords
sibling influence, adolescent substance use, older siblings, deviant peer affiliation, sibling conflict, modeling, antisocial behavior, socialization, dyads
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Child, Conflict, Psychological, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sibling Relations, Substance-Related Disorders, Siblings

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review