Cited by 248Impact of Technology on AdolescentsSexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyChild Development and Digital Technology

Problematic Internet use, well-being, self-esteem and self-control: Data from a high-school survey in China

Open access
Mei, Songli, Yau, Yvonne H.C., Chai, Jingxin, Guo, Jinhua, Potenza, Marc N.·2016·Addictive Behaviors

Abstract

Given the prevalence of Internet use among youth, there is concern that a subset of Internet-using youth may exhibit problematic or addictive patterns of Internet use. The present study examines the association between problematic Internet use (PIU), demographic variables, and health-related measures among Chinese adolescents. Survey data from 1552 adolescents (male=653, mean age=15.43years) from Jilin Province, China, were collected. According to the Young Diagnostic Questionnaire for Internet Addiction (YDQ), 77.8% (n=1207), 16.8% (n=260), and 5.5% (n=85) showed adaptive, maladaptive, and problematic Internet use, respectively. Multinomial logistic regression analysis revealed that gender and family income per month differed between youth showing problematic and adaptive patterns of Internet use. Well-being, self-esteem, and self-control were related to severity of problematic Internet use, with greater severity typically associated with poorer measures in each domain. The findings that severity of problematic Internet use is associated with specific socio-demographic features and temperamental and well-being measures suggest that specific groups of youth may be particularly vulnerable to developing problematic Internet use. Early prevention/intervention programs targeting at-risk groups may help improve public health.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.05.009

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Su WL Lin XY 2014 Internet addiction scale: a literatural analysis of how they are used in China China journal of health psychology 22 5 793 796

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mei, S., Yau, Y. H. C., Chai, J., Guo, J., & Potenza, M. N.
Affiliations
  • Jilin University (CN)
  • Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital (CA)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Potenza, Marc N.
Venue
Addictive Behaviors
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-10
Volume
61
Pages
74-79
ISSN
0306-4603 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2353201731
Cited by
248
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 2
FWCI
54.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Addictive Behaviors (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001863)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA018647)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
Keywords
problematic internet use, internet addiction, adolescents, well-being, self-esteem, self-control, gender differences, household income, Chinese adolescents
MeSH terms
Self-Control, Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, China, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Concept, Students, Behavior, Addictive, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review