Cited by 65Child Abuse and TraumaPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Protective Factors That Buffer Against the Intergenerational Transmission of Trauma from Mothers to Young Children: A Replication Study of Angels in the Nursery

Narayan, Angela J., Ippen, Chandra Ghosh, Harris, William W., Lieberman, Alicia F.·2019·Development and Psychopathology

Abstract

This replication study examined protective effects of positive childhood memories with caregivers ("angels in the nursery") against lifespan and intergenerational transmission of trauma. More positive, elaborated angel memories were hypothesized to buffer associations between mothers' childhood maltreatment and their adulthood posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression symptoms, comorbid psychopathology, and children's trauma exposure. Participants were 185 mothers (M age = 30.67 years, SD = 6.44, range = 17-46 years, 54.6% Latina, 17.8% White, 10.3% African American, 17.3% other; 24% Spanish speaking) and children (M age = 42.51 months; SD = 15.95, range = 3-72 months; 51.4% male). Mothers completed the Angels in the Nursery Interview (Van Horn, Lieberman, & Harris, 2008), and assessments of childhood maltreatment, adulthood psychopathology, children's trauma exposure, and demographics. Angel memories significantly moderated associations between maltreatment and PTSD (but not depression) symptoms, comorbid psychopathology, and children's trauma exposure. For mothers with less positive, elaborated angel memories, higher levels of maltreatment predicted higher levels of psychopathology and children's trauma exposure. For mothers with more positive, elaborated memories, however, predictive associations were not significant, reflecting protective effects. Furthermore, protective effects against children's trauma exposure were significant only for female children, suggesting that angel memories may specifically buffer against intergenerational trauma from mothers to daughters.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0954579418001530

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Narayan, A. J., Ippen, C. G., Harris, W. W., & Lieberman, A. F.
Affiliations
  • University of Denver (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Narayan, Angela J.
Venue
Development and Psychopathology
Published
2019-02
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
173-187
ISSN
  • 0954-5794 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-2198
OpenAlex
W2911362813
Cited by
65
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
8.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Development and Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
intergenerational trauma, child abuse, post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, comorbid psychopathology, maternal mental health, protective factors, gender differences, mother and daughter, replication
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child Abuse, Child, Preschool, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Middle Aged, Mother-Child Relations, Mothers, Mental Recall, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Comorbidity, Parenting, Adult Survivors of Child Abuse, Young Adult, Protective Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review