Cited by 297Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumBirth, Development, and HealthMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare

Pregnancy as a period of risk, adaptation, and resilience for mothers and infants

Open access
Davis, Elysia Poggi, Narayan, Angela J.·2020·Development and Psychopathology

Abstract

The pregnancy period represents a unique window of opportunity to identify risks to both the fetus and mother and to deter the intergenerational transmission of adversity and mental health problems. Although the maternal–fetal dyad is especially vulnerable to the effects of stress during pregnancy, less is known about how the dyad is also receptive to salutary, resilience-promoting influences. The present review adopts life span and intergenerational perspectives to review four key areas of research. The first part describes how pregnancy is a sensitive period for both the mother and fetus. In the second part, the focus is on antecedents of maternal prenatal risks pertaining to prenatal stress response systems and mental health. The third part then turns to elucidating how these alterations in prenatal stress physiology and mental health problems may affect infant and child outcomes. The fourth part underscores how pregnancy is also a time of heightened fetal receptivity to maternal and environmental signals, with profound implications for adaptation. This section also reviews empirical evidence of promotive and protective factors that buffer the mother and fetus from developmental and adaptational problems and covers a sample of rigorous evidence-based prenatal interventions that prevent maladaptation in the maternal–fetal dyad before babies are born. Finally, recommendations elaborate on how to further strengthen understanding of pregnancy as a period of multilevel risk and resilience, enhance comprehensive prenatal screening, and expand on prenatal interventions to promote maternal–fetal adaptation before birth.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0954579420001121

Cites

170 of 170 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adverse conditions, such as the pandemic, during developmental windows of heightened plasticity increase the risk of maladaptive stress responses.

    “Adverse conditions, such as the pandemic, during developmental windows of heightened plasticity increase the risk of maladaptive stress responses.”

    From Post-partum Women’s Anxiety and Parenting Stress: Home-Visiting Protective Effect During the COVID-19 Pandemic (2022) · cites this paper as Davis & Narayan, 2020

    The section on adversity and prenatal maternal stress physiology describes pregnancy as a sensitive, plastic period and says childhood adversity may contribute to maladaptive stress physiology. It does not address the pandemic, and its findings about pregnancy and prior adversity do not establish the claim for developmental windows or adverse conditions generally. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Traditional postpartum practices in many cultures may increase the risk of postpartum depression in some mothers.

    “However, the extant literature suggests that these practices may increase the risk of postpartum depression in some mothers [5, 6].”

    From Understanding mothers’ lived experiences of postpartum depression: a qualitative phenomenological study (2025) · cites this paper as [6]

    The passages on prenatal mental health and stress discuss barriers to care and postpartum depression, but not traditional postpartum practices. Searches for cultural postpartum practices and their relationship to depression found no passage addressing the claimed risk. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davis, E. P., & Narayan, A. J.
Affiliations
University of Denver (US)
Corresponding author
Davis, Elysia Poggi
Venue
Development and Psychopathology
Published
2020-12
Volume
32
Issue
5
Pages
1625-1639
ISSN
  • 0954-5794 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-2198
OpenAlex
W3119751906
Cited by
297
References
169
Citations by year
2026: 72 · 2025: 72 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 1
FWCI
3.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Development and Psychopathology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Society for Research in Child Development
  • National Institutes of Health (MH096889)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL155744)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (P50MH096889, R01MH109662)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Keywords
pregnancy, maternal-fetal dyad, prenatal stress, resilience, prenatal mental health, prenatal intervention, fetal development, infant outcomes, child outcomes, prenatal screening, protective factors
MeSH terms
Child, Female, Humans, Infant, Mothers, Pregnancy, Protective Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review