Family Minds: A randomized controlled trial of a group intervention to improve foster parents’ reflective functioning
Open accessAbstract
Family Minds is a brief group psychoeducational parenting intervention designed to increase the reflective functioning (RF) and mentalization skills of foster parents. RF is important for foster parents who have to build relationships with children whose adverse experiences increase their risk for psychosocial challenges. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) for Family Minds was conducted in Texas with 89 foster parents. The main aims of this study were to examine whether the intervention could significantly increase the RF/mentalization skills of the foster parents and decrease their parenting stress. After 6 weeks, compared with the control group, intervention foster parents improved their RF via a lowering of pre-mentalizing and also significantly decreased parenting stress related to parent–child dysfunctional interactions. Other measures of RF and parenting stress showed no significant differences between groups. Foster child behavior was not significantly different between groups, although data at 6 months showed a possible lowering of internalizing symptoms for children of intervention parents. This RCT provides some encouraging evidence that Family Minds may increase RF in foster parents, improve parental sensitivity and their ability to emotionally regulate, decrease parenting stress related to challenging interactions with their foster children, and possibly decrease children's internalizing behavior.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Neither intervention for attention and hyperactivity demonstrated effectiveness.
“Neither intervention demonstrated effectiveness (Adkins et al., 2021; Moody et al., 2020).”
From Effectiveness of Mental Health and Wellbeing Interventions for Children and Young People in Foster, Kinship, and Residential Care: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2024) · cites this paper as Adkins et al., 2021
Cites
Affect Regulation, Mentalization, and the Development of the Self
Fonagy, P., Gergely, G., Jurist, E. L., & Target, M. (2018) · doi:10.4324/9780429471643 · Cited by 3,886 · see citing works
Self-citationAttachment and reflective function: Their role in self-organization
FONAGY, P., & TARGET, M. (1997) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579497001399 · Cited by 1,708 · see citing works
Self-citationParental reflective functioning: An introduction
Slade, A. (2005) · Attachment & Human Development · doi:10.1080/14616730500245906 · Cited by 1,209 · see citing works
Mentalizing in Clinical Practice
Allen, J. G., Fonagy, P., & Bateman, A. W. (2008) · doi:10.1176/appi.books.9781615370887 · Cited by 944 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Role of Common Factors in Psychotherapy Outcomes
Cuijpers, P., Reijnders, M., & Huibers, M. J. H. (2019) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095424 · Cited by 748 · see citing works
The mentalizing approach to psychopathology: State of the art and future directions
Luyten, P., Campbell, C., Allison, E., & Fonagy, P. (2020) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-071919-015355 · Cited by 748 · see citing works
Self-citationSharp, C., & Fonagy, P. (2008) · Social Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2007.00457.x · Cited by 480 · see citing works
Self-citationSadler, L. S., Slade, A., Close, N., Webb, D. L., Simpson, T., Fennie, K., & Mayes, L. C. (2013) · Infant Mental Health Journal · doi:10.1002/imhj.21406 · Cited by 313 · see citing works
Barroso, N. E., Hungerford, G. M., Garcia, D., Graziano, P. A., & Bagner, D. M. (2016) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/pas0000257 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
New beginnings for mothers and babies in prison: a cluster randomized controlled trial.
Sleed, M., Baradon, T., & Fonagy, P. (2013) · Attachment & Human Development · doi:10.1080/14616734.2013.782651 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Trubey, R., Evans, R., McDonald, S., Noyes, J., Robling, M., Willis, S., Boffey, M., Wooders, C., Vinnicombe, S., & Melendez-Torres, G. J. (2024) · Trauma, Violence, & Abuse · doi:10.1177/15248380241227987 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
“Neither intervention demonstrated effectiveness (Adkins et al., 2021; Moody et al., 2020).”
- Authors
- Adkins, T., Reisz, S., Hasdemir, D., & Fonagy, P.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas at Austin (US)
- Washington State University Vancouver (US)
- University College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Adkins, Tina
- Venue
- Development and Psychopathology
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2021-02-15
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1177-1191
- ISSN
- 0954-5794 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-2198
- OpenAlex
- W3129700993
- Cited by
- 60
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 10.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Development and Psychopathology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Keywords
- foster parents, reflective functioning, mentalization, parenting support, group psychoeducation, parental stress, parent-child interaction, parental sensitivity, emotion regulation
- MeSH terms
- Child, Foster, Child, Child Behavior, Humans, Parent-Child Relations, Parents, Parenting
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review