Cited by 60Child Welfare and AdoptionPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

Family Minds: A randomized controlled trial of a group intervention to improve foster parents’ reflective functioning

Open access
Adkins, Tina, Reisz, Samantha, Hasdemir, Dilara, Fonagy, Peter·2022·Development and Psychopathology

Abstract

Family Minds is a brief group psychoeducational parenting intervention designed to increase the reflective functioning (RF) and mentalization skills of foster parents. RF is important for foster parents who have to build relationships with children whose adverse experiences increase their risk for psychosocial challenges. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) for Family Minds was conducted in Texas with 89 foster parents. The main aims of this study were to examine whether the intervention could significantly increase the RF/mentalization skills of the foster parents and decrease their parenting stress. After 6 weeks, compared with the control group, intervention foster parents improved their RF via a lowering of pre-mentalizing and also significantly decreased parenting stress related to parent–child dysfunctional interactions. Other measures of RF and parenting stress showed no significant differences between groups. Foster child behavior was not significantly different between groups, although data at 6 months showed a possible lowering of internalizing symptoms for children of intervention parents. This RCT provides some encouraging evidence that Family Minds may increase RF in foster parents, improve parental sensitivity and their ability to emotionally regulate, decrease parenting stress related to challenging interactions with their foster children, and possibly decrease children's internalizing behavior.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s095457942000214x

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Adkins, T., Reisz, S., Hasdemir, D., & Fonagy, P.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • Washington State University Vancouver (US)
  • University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Adkins, Tina
Venue
Development and Psychopathology
Published
2021-02-15
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
1177-1191
ISSN
  • 0954-5794 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-2198
OpenAlex
W3129700993
Cited by
60
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
10.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Development and Psychopathology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
foster parents, reflective functioning, mentalization, parenting support, group psychoeducation, parental stress, parent-child interaction, parental sensitivity, emotion regulation
MeSH terms
Child, Foster, Child, Child Behavior, Humans, Parent-Child Relations, Parents, Parenting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review