Cited by 767Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The mentalizing approach to psychopathology: State of the art and future directions

Open access
Luyten, Patrick, Campbell, Chloe, Allison, Elizabeth, Fonagy, Peter·2020·Annual Review of Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Mentalizing is the capacity to understand others and oneself in terms of internal mental states. It is assumed to be underpinned by four dimensions: automatic-controlled, internally-externally focused, self-other, and cognitive-affective. Research suggests that mental disorders are associated with different imbalances in these dimensions. Addressing the quality of mentalizing as part of psychosocial treatments may benefit individuals with various mental disorders. We suggest that mentalizing is a helpful transtheoretical and transdiagnostic concept to explain vulnerability to psychopathology and its treatment. This review summarizes the mentalizing approach to psychopathology from a developmental socioecological evolutionary perspective. We then focus on the application of the mentalizing approach to personality disorders, and we review studies that have extended this approach to other types of psychopathology, including depression, anxiety, and eating disorders. We summarize core principles of mentalization-based treatments and preventive interventions and the evidence for their effectiveness. We conclude with recommendations for future research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-071919-015355

Cites

149 of 149 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Simonsen S, Euler S. 2019. Avoidant and narcissistic personality disorders. See Bateman & Fonagy 2019b, pp. 351-67

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Luyten, P., Campbell, C., Allison, E., & Fonagy, P.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London WC1E 7HB, United Kingdom
Venue
Annual Review of Clinical Psychology
Published
2020-05-07
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
297-325
ISSN
  • 1548-5943 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-5951
OpenAlex
W2994905377
Cited by
748
References
146
Citations by year
2026: 121 · 2025: 137 · 2024: 172 · 2023: 117 · 2022: 87 · 2021: 88 · 2020: 25
FWCI
6.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annual Review of Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0514-10157)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
mentalization, mentalization-based treatment, psychopathology, transdiagnostic model, personality disorders, depression, anxiety, eating disorders, preventive interventions
MeSH terms
Mentalization, Mental Disorders, Humans, Psychotherapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review