Cited by 31Avian ecology and behaviorAnimal Ecology and Behavior StudiesTurtle Biology and Conservation

Establishment of a new, secure colony of Endangered Bermuda Petrel Pterodroma cahow by translocation of near-fledged nestlings

Open access
CARLILE, NICHOLAS, PRIDDEL, DAVID, MADEIROS, JEREMY·2012·Bird Conservation International

Abstract

Summary: Until recently, Bermuda Petrel Pterodroma cahow (IUCN Category: ‘Endangered’) bred only in sub-optimal habitat on four small islets in north-east Bermuda. Although intensive management of the population since 1962 has led to a substantial increase in population size (now approaching 100 pairs), the nesting habitat on these four islets is being increasingly inundated, eroded and destroyed by high seas associated with hurricanes and storms. To ensure the long-term conservation of the species a decision was made to establish a new colony at a more secure site on nearby Nonsuch Island, where they once bred in large numbers. Between 2004 and 2008, 104 near-fledged nestlings were translocated to artificial burrows on Nonsuch Island, where they were hand-fed meals of fish and squid. All but three translocated birds fledged successfully, with the first returning to Nonsuch Island in February 2008. The first Bermuda Petrel egg on Nonsuch Island in more than 300 years was laid in January 2009, and the resultant fledgling departed in June of the same year. By the end of the 2009/10 breeding season, a total of 18 Bermuda Petrels have been recorded on Nonsuch Island, 17 were translocated as near-fledged nestlings, and one bird came from the existing colonies. A total of five eggs have been produced, resulting in two fledglings. The establishment of this new colony, at a site that is much more secure than the existing nesting sites, greatly enhances the conservation prospects of the species and demonstrates the importance of translocation as a tool for the conservation of threatened seabirds.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0959270911000372

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The approach of hand- or captive-rearing chicks has been used successfully in combination with translocation in the conservation of at least 11 seabird species worldwide.

    “The approach has been used successfully in combination with translocation in the conservation of at least 11 seabird species worldwide [39]–[42].”

    From Hand-Rearing, Release and Survival of African Penguin Chicks Abandoned Before Independence by Moulting Parents (2014) · cites this paper as [41]

    The Feeding of translocated nestlings section describes feeding Bermuda Petrel chicks after translocation, and the Discussion reports successful fledging in this project and other seabird translocations. The Discussion mentions eight other translocations, but counts projects rather than distinct species; it does not establish successful hand- or captive-rearing with translocation for at least 11 seabird species worldwide. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Butler, N. (1619) Historye of the Bermudaes. In J. H. Lefroy, ed. Memorials of the discovery and early settlement of the Ber- mudas or Somers Islands 1515-1652. Com- piled from the Colonial Records and other original sources. Vol. 1. (1877). London: Longmans, Green and Co.
  2. Wingate, D. B. (1978) Excluding competitors from Bermuda petrel nesting burrows. Pp. 93-102 in S. A. Temple, ed. Endangered birds: management techniques for preserv- ing threatened species. Madison, USA: Uni- versity of Wisconsin Press.
  3. Wingate, D. B. (1985) The restoration of Nonsuch Island as a living museum of Bermuda's pre-colonial terrestrial biome. Pp. 225-238 in P. J. Moors, ed. Conserva- tion of island birds. Cambridge: Interna- tional Council for Bird Preservation.
  4. Zar, J. H. (1974) Biostatistical analysis. Engle- wood Cliffs, N J: Prentice Hall.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
CARLILE, N., PRIDDEL, D., & MADEIROS, J.
Affiliations
NSW Environment and Heritage (AU)
Corresponding author
PRIDDEL, DAVID
Venue
Bird Conservation International
Published
2012-02-06
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
46-58
ISSN
  • 0959-2709 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-0001
OpenAlex
W2171137640
Cited by
31
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Bird Conservation International (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Turtle Biology and Conservation
Keywords
endangered seabirds, translocation, colony founding, artificial burrows, hand-rearing, breeding success, hurricane impacts, seabird conservation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review