Cited by 6Avian ecology and behaviorSpecies Distribution and Climate ChangeWildlife Ecology and Conservation

Distribution and status of the Pallas’s Fish Eagle Haliaeetus leucoryphus in Mongolia: a cause for conservation concern?

Open access
GILBERT, MARTIN, TINGAY, RUTH, LOSOLMAA, JAMBAL, SUREDA, NADIA, GILBERT, COLIN, BATMUNKH, DAVAASUREN, GOMBOBAATAR, SUNDEV·2014·Bird Conservation International

Abstract

Summary: Pallas’s Fish Eagle Haliaeetus leucoryphus (PFE) is sparsely distributed across a vast swathe of central, eastern and southern Asia, and is classified as ‘Vulnerable’ by IUCN on the basis of population size and reports of declines in many areas. Mongolia has long been considered a breeding stronghold for the species, but evidence to support this is unclear. Our objective was to assess the current distribution and status of the PFE in Mongolia to enable a more accurate assessment of the species’ conservation status, through collation of existing information from the historical literature, and a contemporary survey of historical sites and potential PFE breeding habitat. Thirty-four traceable locations were identified in the historical literature, of which breeding activity had been recorded in seven. Field surveys were conducted at a total of 77 sites throughout the study period (2005–2011) between April and October, including 21 of the historical PFE locations. PFE were observed at eight sites, all of which were historical PFEs locations, and no evidence of breeding activity was recorded. These findings suggest that Mongolia is not (and may never have been) a breeding stronghold for the PFE. The lack of eagles at 13 of 21 historical sites surveyed, coupled with a lack of sightings of birds at alternative locations is suggestive of a decline in site occupancy. Observations of juvenile eagles within one month of the spring thaw suggests that at least a proportion of Mongolian PFEs are breeding at southern latitudes, and future studies to establish these migratory linkages are warranted. These findings, coupled with evidence of declines in other parts of the PFE range indicate a need to re-evaluate the species’ conservation status, and in particular to determine the number of mature PFEs present in suitable habitat in the Indian Subcontinent and Myanmar between November and March.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This study reassesses the distribution and status of Pallas’s Fish Eagle (*Haliaeetus leucoryphus*) in Mongolia using a historical literature review and field surveys from 2005–2011. It finds no evidence of breeding and concludes Mongolia is not, and may never have been, a breeding stronghold, with evidence suggesting a decline in site occupancy.

Key findings

  • Historical review identified 34 traceable PFE locations in Mongolia; breeding activity had been recorded at seven, but only five references specifically mentioned breeding PFEs at seven sites.
  • Across 77 surveyed sites, including 21 historical PFE locations and all seven historical breeding locations, PFEs were observed at eight sites, all historical, with no evidence of breeding; no eagles were found at 13 of 21 historical sites surveyed.
  • Observed PFEs comprised 21 adults, five sub-adults, and 10 juveniles; PFE presence was significantly associated with Great Cormorant presence (chi-value = 7.586, df = 1, P = 0.006), but not with White-tailed Eagle presence (chi-value = 1.387, df = 1, P = 0.239).
  • The authors suggest the IUCN ‘Vulnerable’ status may be inaccurate, that the <10,000 mature individuals threshold is probably an overestimate, and that <2,500 mature individuals may be more realistic; they recommend surveys in the Indian Subcontinent and Myanmar between November and March and satellite telemetry to establish migratory linkages.

Methods

  • Historical literature review of 43 Mongolian, Russian, German, and English sources covering 1901–2009, held at the National University of Mongolia and Mongolian National Library; localities were mapped and classified as specific locations, general areas, or untraceable, with museum specimen verification attempted.
  • Field surveys were conducted each year from 2005–2011 between April and October, combining opportunistic and targeted visits across 77 sites in 12 of 21 aimags; surveys used vehicles, foot, and an inflatable zodiac, with binoculars, spotting scopes, and GPS, recording PFE age, White-tailed Eagles, and Great Cormorants.
  • Wetlands were categorised as lakes or rivers; lake surface area was measured with GIS and elevation with GPS; associations between PFE and cormorant or White-tailed Eagle presence were tested with chi-square tests.

Limitations

  • The paper states surveys were not comprehensive: 18 historical locations were not visited, some large sites received only partial coverage, and PFEs may have been missed; historical authors may also have failed to observe or record breeding activity.
  • The paper notes possible breeding-site switching could not be ruled out, but no breeding evidence was found at 55 widely dispersed wetlands not in the historical literature; museum specimen data are uncertain due to misidentification, labelling problems, translation issues, and collector unreliability.
  • Evident from the text: migratory connectivity remains unresolved, no telemetry was conducted, and survey effort varied (one to 24 visits per site, mean 3.0, SD 3.6), so absence of breeding evidence is not definitive proof of absence.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0959270913000543

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 15 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    Thirty-four traceable locations were identified in the historical literature.

    “Thirty-four traceable locations were identified in the historical literature, of which breeding activity had been recorded in seven.”
    • Also stated in: § Field surveys · plain
      “A total of 77 sites were visited including 21 of the 34 traceable, historical PFE sites (Table S2 and Figure 2 )”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Breeding activity had been recorded in seven historical locations.

    “of which breeding activity had been recorded in seven.”
    • Also stated in: § Historical literature review · plain
      “only five referred to breeding PFEs at seven sites (Table S1 in the online supplementary materials).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    All sites where Pallas's Fish Eagles were observed were historical PFE locations.

    “all of which were historical PFEs locations”
    • Also stated in: § Field surveys · plain
      “all of which were known historical sites”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Pallas's Fish Eagles were observed at eight sites during field surveys.

    “PFE were observed at eight sites, all of which were historical PFEs locations, and no evidence of breeding activity was recorded.”
    • Also stated in: § Field surveys · plain
      “PFEs were observed at eight sites ( Table 1 ), all of which were known historical sites.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Pallas's Fish Eagles were not detected at 13 of 21 historical sites surveyed.

    “The lack of eagles at 13 of 21 historical sites surveyed, coupled with a lack of sightings of birds at alternative locations is suggestive of a decline in site occupancy.”
    • Also stated in: § Discussion · hedged
      “Our failure to detect PFEs at 13 of 21 historical sites may be indicative of a decline in site occupancy of PFEs in our study area.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 7
  • May combine two claims. 9
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingown data

    Field surveys were conducted at 77 sites between 2005 and 2011.

    “Field surveys were conducted at a total of 77 sites throughout the study period (2005)(2006)(2007)(2008)(2009)(2010)(2011) between April and October, including 21 of the historical PFE locations.”
    • Also stated in: § Field surveys · plain
      “A total of 77 sites were visited including 21 of the 34 traceable, historical PFE sites (Table S2 and Figure 2 )”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    White-tailed Eagles were only observed at four of the PFE sites, an association that was not significant (chi-value = 1.387, df = 1, P = 0.239).

    “Whereas, White-tailed Eagles were only observed at four of the PFE sites, an association that was not significant (chi-value = 1.387, df = 1, P = 0.239).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Pallas's Fish Eagles were mentioned in 30 of 43 reviewed literature sources, relating to 82 discrete observations from 39 sites.

    “PFEs were mentioned in 30 of the 43 reviewed literature sources, relating to 82 discrete observations from a total of 39 sites ( Figure 1 ).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The Khuvsgul Nuur specimen #NMW 42.010 is in fact a White-tailed Eagle, and a second putative PFE #NMW 42.011 was also re-identified as this species.

    “a re-examination of the Khuvsgul Nuur specimen (#NMW 42.010) has determined that this bird is in fact a White-tailed Eagle (A.Gamauf, Naturhistorisches Museum Wien, in litt .2013), and a second putative PFE obtained by the same collector in October 1913 (#NMW 42.011) was also re-identified as this species.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Observations of Pallas's Fish Eagle reported along the Kherlen Gol and Churchin Gol by Popov actually referred to White-tailed Eagles, likely due to mistranslation.

    “we found that observations of PFE reported along the Kherlen Gol and Churchin Gol by Popov ( 1991 ) in Stubbe et al. ( 2010 ), actually referred to White-tailed Eagles, and were likely to have been due to a mistranslation from the original Russian text.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Popov ( 1991 ) in Stubbe et al. ( 2010 )

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Mongolia is not, and may never have been, a breeding stronghold for Pallas's Fish Eagle.

    “These findings suggest that Mongolia is not (and may never have been) a breeding stronghold for the PFE.”
    • Also stated in: § Conclusions · hedged
      “We conclude that Mongolia is not a breeding stronghold for PFE and probably never was, as we could find no material evidence suggestive of breeding activity in either the historical record or during our own extensive field surveys.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The absence of detected breeding activity in historical records and field surveys indicates absence of breeding.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted).

    Premisecitation

    It had been suggested that Mongolia held the main Pallas's Fish Eagle breeding population.

    “it had been suggested that Mongolia held the main PFE breeding population (BirdLife International 2007 ).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites BirdLife International 2007

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Mongolia has long been considered a breeding stronghold for Pallas's Fish Eagle.

    “Mongolia has long been considered a breeding stronghold for the species, but evidence to support this is unclear.”
    • Also stated in: § Introduction · hedged
      “it had been suggested that Mongolia held the main PFE breeding population (BirdLife International 2007 ).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites BirdLife International 2007

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The three main breeding populations of Pallas's Fish Eagle were believed to be in China, Mongolia and the Indian subcontinent.

    “According to BirdLife International ( 2001 , 2007 ), the three main breeding populations of PFE were believed to be in China, Mongolia and the Indian subcontinent, although there were few quantitative data to support that assessment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites BirdLife International 2001

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [2007]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Sourav et al. documented Pallas's Fish Eagles arriving to breed in Bangladesh in late August and leaving by the end of April/early May.

    “Sourav et al. ( 2011 )documented PFEs arriving to breed in Bangladesh in late August and leaving (for an unknown destination) by the end of April/early May.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sourav et al. 2011

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Threats specifically affecting Pallas's Fish Eagle in Mongolia could have wider implications across the species' range, assuming migratory connectivity between Mongolian and southern populations.

    “Assuming that there is a migratory connectivity between the Mongolian and southern PFE populations, then it follows that threats specifically affecting the species in Mongolia could have wider implications across the species' range.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: There is migratory connectivity between the Mongolian and southern Pallas's Fish Eagle populations.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Mongolia has been experiencing a protracted decline in available surface water, leading to a reduction in water levels at many lakes and drying of several river drainages of importance to Pallas's Fish Eagle.

    “Mongolia has also been experiencing a protracted decline in available surface water, leading to a reduction in water levels at many lakes, and drying of several river drainages of importance to PFE (for example site numbers 6, 45, 72 and 74, Figures 1 and 2 ) (Sternberg 2008, Sukh 2012 ).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Sternberg 2008 source
    • cites Sukh 2012

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    More evidence has suggested the Mongolian Pallas's Fish Eagle population may be smaller than previously estimated.

    “Since then, more evidence has suggested the Mongolian PFE population may be smaller than previously estimated (Gilbert and Gombobaatar 2009 ).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gilbert and Gombobaatar 2009

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The Pallas's Fish Eagle conservation status may be more endangered than currently recognised.

    “The completion of these studies would be essential to facilitate a reassessment of the species' conservation status, which may be more endangered than currently recognised.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Extreme climatic conditions in Mongolia will likely restrict the Pallas's Fish Eagle's potential breeding period to April-October, with hatching synchronised with the thaw in mid-May.

    “The extreme climatic conditions in Mongolia will likely restrict the PFE's potential breeding period to the months of April-October, so that hatching is synchronised with the thaw in mid-May (as with White-tailed Eagle, the PFE's congener; pers.obs.).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Long-term climate models predict that the trend of declining surface water is likely to continue and could lead to further loss of Pallas's Fish Eagle habitat.

    “Long-term climate models predict that this trend is likely to continue, and could lead to further loss of PFE habitat in the coming years (Simonov and Dahmer 2008 ).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Simonov and Dahmer 2008
16 of 16
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    There is migratory connectivity between the Mongolian and southern Pallas's Fish Eagle populations.

    “Assuming that there is a migratory connectivity between the Mongolian and southern PFE populations, then it follows that threats specifically affecting the species in Mongolia could have wider implications across the species' range.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The absence of detected breeding activity in historical records and field surveys indicates absence of breeding.

    “as we could find no material evidence suggestive of breeding activity in either the historical record or during our own extensive field surveys.”
2 of 2

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Conclusion denies historical breeding evidence despite a recorded nest and egg

    Major

    The conclusion says the historical record contained no material evidence suggestive of breeding, but the results describe a historical record of a nest containing an egg.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 12 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. Vazhov, 2011, Raptors of the Ukok Plateau, Russia, Raptors Conserv., 22, 153
  2. Tugarinov, 1928, Neue Vogolformen aus der nördlichen Mongolei, Ezeg. Zool. Mus., 29, 267
  3. Sushkin P. P . (1938) Birds of the Soviet Altai and adjacent parts of north-western Mongolia. Moscow–Leningrad: Academy of Sciences of USSR Press. (In Russian).
  4. Sourav, 2011, Pallas’s Fish Eagle Haliaeetus leucoryphus in Bangladesh, Birding ASIA, 16, 101
  5. Popov, 2002, Pallas’s fish eagle Haliaeetus leucoryphus in southern Siberia, Eng. Ornitol. Journal. Express-issue., 175, 124
  6. Popov, 1991, Notes on the distribution of rare species of birds in Hentii province, Ecology and bird fauna in Eastern Siberia, 147
  7. Sumiya D. and Skryabin N. G . (1989) Birds of the Lake Hovsgol area, PRM [Ptitsy Prikhubsugulya, MNR]. Irkutsk, Russia: Irkutsk University Press. (In Russian).
  8. Piechocki, 1983, Abriβ zur Erforschungsgeschichte der Avifaunamongolica, Erforsch. Biol. Ress. MVR, Halle (Saale), 3, 5
  9. Kozlova, 1930, Birds of southwest Zabaikal, North Mongolia and Central Gobi
  10. 2001, IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1
  11. Gombobaatar, 2011, Regional Red List Series Vol. 7. Birds
  12. Fisher, 1970, Ornithologische Beobachtungen und der Versuch einer Bestandserfassung der Vögel an den mongolischen Wüstenseen Orog-nuur und Buncagan-nur, Zool. Abh. Tierkd. Mus. Dresden, 30, 101
  13. Buturlin, 1913, Notes of Zoological Branch of the Imperial Society: Nature, anthropology, and ethnography. New Edition 1
  14. Bold, 2005, Birds, amphibians, and reptiles of Mongolia 2, 23
  15. Zhatkanbaev, 2011, White-Tailed Eagle in the delta of the Ile River and on Balkhash Lake, south-eastern Kazakhstan, Raptor Res., 22, 76
  16. Popov, 2008, About the distribution of birds of prey in Northern Hubsugul Lake Region, Mongolia, Raptors Conserv., 14, 116
  17. Stubbe, 2010, Exploration into the biological resources of Mongolia, Volume 11
  18. 2004, Important Birds Areas in Asia: key sites for conservation
  19. Kovalenko, 2009, Modern records of the Pallas’ Fish Eagle in Kazakhstan, Raptors Conserv., 15, 134
  20. Berezovikov, 2003, Birds of Zaisan Valley. III. Falconiformes, Galliformes, Gruiformes, Russ. Ornithol. J., 12, 287
  21. 2001, Threatened birds of Asia: the BirdLife International Red Data Book
  22. Wingard, 2006, Silent steppe: The illegal wildlife trade crisis in Mongolia
  23. Katzner, 2010, The eagle watchers, 1
  24. Gilbert, 2009, The status and distribution of Pallas’s Fish Eagle in Mongolia: a report on field surveys June-August 2009
  25. Baranov, 1991, Rare and little-known birds of Tuva

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
GILBERT, M., TINGAY, R., LOSOLMAA, J., SUREDA, N., GILBERT, C., BATMUNKH, D., & GOMBOBAATAR, S.
Affiliations
  • Wildlife Conservation Society (US)
  • National University of Mongolia (MN)
Corresponding author
  • GILBERT, MARTIN
  • GILBERT, COLIN
Venue
Bird Conservation International
Published
2014-03-25
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
379-388
ISSN
  • 0959-2709 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-0001
OpenAlex
W2022063656
Cited by
6
References
12
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Bird Conservation International (publishedVersion)
Funders
Peregrine Fund
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Keywords
Haliaeetus leucoryphus, Mongolia, conservation status reassessment, vulnerable species, breeding habitat, population decline (ecology)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-12.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-12.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review