The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stones to Build a World: Circulation and Value of Materials in Pre-Columbian Northwestern Argentina
Abstract
This article presents a contextual analysis of stone materials from northwestern Argentina, produced at a time when sedentary life was unfolding throughout the region. It examines the circulation and use practices of everyday obsidian tools, as well as the technical and semantic relationships they established within the wider field of materials and artefacts that characterized the period. Arguing for a sensitive approach to the classificatory logic of past societies, it is proposed here that a particular hierarchy of stone artefacts of regional significance emerged during this period. After discussing anthropological value perspectives and their relevance to Andean archaeology, the article explores Andean conceptualizations of stone that can provide a culturally specific framework for understanding ancient stone materials. The final sections examine the technical and contextual practices involving with domestic stone tools, as well as how these were embedded in a wider landscape of physical and semantic relationships. It is hoped that this article will contribute to ongoing discussions on non-Western models of value and their relevance for understanding social interaction and complexity, both in the south-central Andes and beyond.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The pattern of sequential growth indicated by chronological data [11,22,23] and reinforced by our spatial and mobility analysis also aligns well with Andean studies, which have shown how settlements grow through the gradual fission of households over generations.”
From Andean landscape legacies: comprehensive remote sensing mapping and GIS analysis of long-term settlement and land use for sustainable futures (NW argentina) (2024) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“Cooperative ties across the sites contemporarily occupied [22,33]-a pattern well described for similar small-scale settled societies in other sectors of NW Argentina (e.g., [68,69])-would have resulted in the overall spread of structures and general uniform morphology, which, given its efficacy, would have been passed down as intergenerational knowledge.”
From Andean landscape legacies: comprehensive remote sensing mapping and GIS analysis of long-term settlement and land use for sustainable futures (NW argentina) (2024) · cites this paper as [22]
Citations
Cites
Bray, T. L. (2009) · Cambridge Archaeological Journal · doi:10.1017/s0959774309000547 · Cited by 98 · cited 2×
“Other rocks, as well as landforms such as mountains and volcanoes, were also huacas or sacred ancestors, and their material endurance signalled their nature as powerful deities (Bastien 1985; Bouysse Cassagne 1987, 215–16; Bray 2009; Dean 2010; Lau 2008; Nielsen 2010; Sillar 2009).”
Background
Cited by
ACTUALIDAD Y POTENCIAL DE LA ARQUEOLOGÍA INTERNODAL SURANDINA
Nielsen, A. E. (2017) · Estudios atacameños · doi:10.4067/s0718-10432017000300012 · Cited by 13
Lazzari, M., Oltean, I., Oyaneder Rodríguez, A., Scattolin, M. C., & Pereyra Domingorena, L. (2024) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs16203795 · Cited by 4
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lazzari, M.
- Venue
- Cambridge Archaeological Journal
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2015-05-12
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-22
- ISSN
- 0959-7743
- 1474-0540
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.