Cited by 12Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesPrimate Behavior and EcologyAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

The effect of environmental enrichment and visitors on the behaviour and welfare of two captive hamadryas baboons (Papio hamadryas)

Open access
Bortolini, TS, Bicca-Marques, JC·2011·Animal Welfare

Abstract

The welfare of zoo animals depends on a combination of physical, social, dietary and other ecological characteristics of the captive setting. We analysed the influence of the transfer of an adult couple of hamadryas baboons (Papio hamadryas) from a small and non-enriched cage that was closed to the public to a larger and enriched exhibit at the visitation area of the Sapucaia do Sul Zoological Park, RS, Brazil. A total of 350 h divided into four stages were spent observing the baboons: (i) in the non-enriched enclosure before the transfer; (ii) soon after the transfer to the enriched enclosure; (iii) six months; and (iv) 12 months after the transfer. The occurrence of stereotypic, social aggressive and social affiliative behaviours was recorded by ‘all occurrences’ sampling. The female showed a decrease in frequency of a stereotypic behaviour (spinning) and an increase in grooming in the enriched enclosure. The male showed a decrease in the frequency of certain stress-related or stereotypic behaviours after transfer, but other stress-related behaviours either increased or remained constant. The male behaviour of throwing faeces was affected by the presence of visitors. We suggest that the well-being of the female was more positively influenced by the new enclosure than that of the male, although gender differences may reflect the normal behavioural repertoire of this sexually dimorphic species.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0962728600003201

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Higher rates of aggression associated with visitor presence were noted in baboons, Indian gaur and cotton-top tamarins.

    “Higher rates of aggression associated with visitor presence were noted in baboons [89], Indian gaur [90] and cotton-top tamarins [91]”

    From The visitor effect on zoo animals: implications and opportunities for zoo animal welfare (2019) · cites this paper as [89]

    The Results report that the male baboon threw faeces more often on Sundays, when visitor numbers were highest, than on Mondays, when the zoo was closed. The Discussion describes this as faeces-throwing towards the public and suggests the male was negatively affected by visitors. The paper supports an increase in this specific confrontational behaviour, not a general increase in aggression; this citation is attached only to the baboon portion of the sentence. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Barrett L, Henzi SP, Weingrill T, Lycett JE and Hill RA 1999 Market forces predict grooming reciprocity in female baboons. Proceedings of the Royal Society B266: 665-670
  2. Bergeron R, Badnell-Waters AJ, Lambton S and Mason G 2006 Stereotypic oral behavior in captive ungulates: foraging, diet and gastrointestinal function. In: Mason G and Rushen J (eds) Stereotypic Animal Behaviour: Fundamentals and Applications to Welfare, Second Edition pp 19-26. CABI: Wallingford, UK
  3. Broom DM 1991 Animal welfare: concepts and measurement. Journal of Animal Science 69: 4167-4175
  4. Davey G 2007 Visitors' effects on the welfare of animals in the zoo: a review. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 10: 169-183
  5. Dellinge-Ness LA and Handler L 2006 Self-injurious behavior in human and non-human primates. Clinical Psychology Review 26: 503-514
  6. Eaton GG, Kelley ST, Axthelm MK, Iliff-Sizemore SA and Shiigi SM 1994 Psychological well-being in paired adult female rhesus (Macaca mulatta). American Journal of Primatology 33: 89-99
  7. Hamilton WJ III 1985 Demographic consequences of a food and water shortage to desert chacma baboons,,Papio ursinus. International Journal of Primatology 6: 451-462
  8. Jolly CJ 2007 Baboons, mandrills, and mangabeys: afro-papionin socioecology in a phylogenetic perspective. In: Campbell CJ, Fuentes A, MacKinnon KC, Panger M and Bearder SK (eds) Primates in Perspective pp 240-251. Oxford University Press: New York, USA
  9. Kessel A and Brent L 2001 The rehabilitation of captive baboons. Journal of Medical Primatology 30: 71-80
  10. Kummer H 1995 In Quest of the Sacred Baboon: A Scientist's Journey, First Edition. Princeton University Press: New Jersey, USA
  11. Mallapur A and Choudhury BC 2003 Behavioral abnormali- ties in captive non-human primates. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 6: 275-284
  12. Martin P and Bateson P 1993 Measuring Behaviour: An Introductory Guide, Second Edition. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, USA Mason GJ 1991 Stereotypies: a critical review. Animal Behaviour 41: 1015-1037
  13. Reinhardt V and Roberts A 1997 Effective feeding enrichment for non-human primates: a brief review. Animal Welfare 6: 265-272
  14. Schapiro SJ, Bloomsmith MA, Suarez SA and Porter LM 1996 Effects of social and inanimate enrichment on the behavior of yearling rhesus monkeys. American Journal of Primatology 40: 247-260
  15. Shepherdson DJ 1998 Introduction: tracing the path of environ- mental enrichment in zoos. In: Shepherdson DJ, Mellen JD and Hutchins M (eds) Second Nature: Environmental Enrichment for Captive Animals pp 1-12. Smithsonian Institution Press: Washington, DC, USA Shyne A 2006 Meta-analytic review of the effects of enrichment on stereotypic behavior in zoo mammals. Zoo Biology 25: 317-337

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bortolini, T., & Bicca-Marques, J.
Affiliations
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (BR)
Venue
Animal Welfare
Published
2011-11
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
573-579
ISSN
  • 0962-7286 (ISSN-L)
  • 2054-1538
OpenAlex
W2614055902
Cited by
12
References
2
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Animal Welfare (publishedVersion)
Funders
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (303154/2009-8)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
hamadryas baboon, Papio hamadryas, environmental enrichment, zoo animal welfare, captive primates, stereotypy, social aggression, affiliative behavior, grooming, stress behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review