The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Infrared thermography as a non-invasive tool to study animal welfare
Abstract
Growing public concern regarding animal welfare and consumer demand for humanely produced products have placed pressure on the meat, wool and dairy industries to improve and confirm the welfare status of their animals. This has increased the need for reliable methods of assessing animal welfare during commercial farm practices. The measurement of the stress caused by commercial farm practices is a major component of animal welfare assessment. However, a major issue for animal welfare science is that many of the techniques used to measure stress involve invasive procedures, such as blood sampling, which may themselves cause a stress response and therefore affect the measurement of interest. To reduce this problem, a number of non-invasive or minimally invasive methods and devices have been developed to measure stress. These include the measurement of cortisol concentrations in saliva and faeces, and remote devices for recording body temperature, heart rate and the collection of blood samples. This review describes the benefits and limitations of some of these methods for measuring stress. In particular, the review focuses on recent advances and current research in the use of infrared thermography (IRT) for measuring stress. Specific applications for IRT in the dairy and beef industries are also described including an automated, non-invasive system for early diagnosis of infection in cattle. It is essential that non-invasive measures of acute and chronic stress are developed for reliable assessment of animal welfare during standard farm management practices and IRT may be a useful tool for this purpose. IRT may offer advantages over many other non-invasive systems as it appears to be capable of measuring different components of the stress axis, including acute sympathetic and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical responses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Schaefer, A. L., Cook, N. J., Bench, C., Chabot, J. B., Colyn, J., Liu, T., Okine, E. K., Stewart, M., & Webster, J. R. (2012) · Research in Veterinary Science · doi:10.1016/j.rvsc.2011.09.021 · Cited by 229
Self-citationInfrared skin temperature measurements for monitoring health in pigs: A review
Soerensen, D. D., & Pedersen, L. J. (2015) · Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica · doi:10.1186/s13028-015-0094-2 · Cited by 212
Schaefer, A. L., Cook, N. J., Church, J. S., Basarab, J., Perry, B., Miller, C., & Tong, A. K. W. (2007) · Research in Veterinary Science · doi:10.1016/j.rvsc.2007.01.008 · Cited by 196
Self-citationTheurer, M. E., Anderson, D. E., White, B. J., Miesner, M. D., Mosier, D. A., Coetzee, J. F., Lakritz, J., & Amrine, D. E. (2013) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas.2012-5823 · Cited by 91
Using technology to monitor and improve zoo animal welfare
Whitham, J., & Miller, L. (2016) · Animal Welfare · doi:10.7120/09627286.25.4.395 · Cited by 76
Metadata
- Authors
- Stewart, M., Webster, Jr., Schaefer, A., Cook, N., & Scott, S.
- Venue
- Animal Welfare
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2005-11
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 319-325
- ISSN
- 0962-7286 (ISSN-L)
- 2054-1538
- OpenAlex
- W2301411280
- Cited by
- 336
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Infrared thermography as a non-invasive tool to study animal welfare. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s096272860002964x
- The paper
- Stewart, M., Webster, Jr., Schaefer, A., Cook, N., & Scott, S. (2005). Infrared thermography as a non-invasive tool to study animal welfare. Animal Welfare. https://doi.org/10.1017/s096272860002964x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.