Cited by 119Ethics and bioethics in healthcareMedical and Health Sciences ResearchLegal Rights and Human Rights

Bioethics and Human Rights: A Historical Perspective

BAKER, ROBERT·2001·Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics

Abstract

Bioethics and human rights were conceived in the aftermath of the Holocaust, when moral outrage reenergized the outmoded concepts of “medical ethics” and “natural rights,” renaming them “bioethics,” and “human rights” to give them new purpose. Originally, the principles of bioethics were a means for protecting human rights, but through a historical accident, bioethical principles came to be considered as fundamental. In this paper I reflect on the parallel development and accidental divorce of bioethics and human rights to urge their reconciliation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0963180101003048

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Commentators have called India's reservation system among the most radical policies globally.

    “Reservations in India have been described as one of the world's most radical policies [25] (see [164] for more).”

    From Re-imagining Algorithmic Fairness in India and Beyond (2021) · cites this paper as [25]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
BAKER, R.
Affiliations
Union College (US)
Corresponding author
BAKER, ROBERT
Venue
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics
Published
2001-06-29
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
241-252
ISSN
  • 0963-1801 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-2147
OpenAlex
W2044788044
Cited by
119
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Medical and Health Sciences Research
  • Social Sciences › Law › Legal Rights and Human Rights
Keywords
bioethics, human rights, history of bioethics, Holocaust, medical ethics, natural rights, bioethical principles
MeSH terms
Asia, Bioethics, Europe, Helsinki Declaration, Humans, Human Experimentation, Human Rights, Political Systems, Social Justice, United Nations, United States, Holocaust, Internationality, History, 20th Century

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review