Cited by 91Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesAging, Health, and DisabilityPalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues

Daily hassles, physical illness, and sleep problems in older adults with wishes to die

Open access
Lapierre, Sylvie, Boyer, Richard, Desjardins, Sophie, Dubé, Micheline, Lorrain, Dominique, Préville, Michel, Brassard, Joëlle·2012·International Psychogeriatrics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Factors associated with the wish to die should be investigated in order to gain more opportunities for preventive interventions targeting older adults at risk for suicide. The goal of the research was to study the prevalence and associated factors of wishes to die in older adults living in the community using the data from a survey on the prevalence of mental disorders in this population. METHODS: With a representative sample of community living older adults aged 65 years and over (N = 2777), we compared individuals with the wish to die (n = 163) to those without the wish to die on the basis of the presence and severity of daily hassles, physical illness, and sleep quality. RESULTS: Logistic regression revealed that when depression and sociodemographic variables were held constant, self-rated physical health, number of chronic illnesses, number and intensity of daily hassles, as well as sleep problems were significantly associated with the wish to die in older adults. Painful illnesses and daytime dysfunction due to sleep problems were also associated factors with the wish to die. CONCLUSION: Since desire for death is the first step into the suicidal process, health professionals should seriously consider the important and unique contribution of these variables in order to have more opportunities for detection and intervention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1041610211001591

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lapierre, S., Boyer, R., Desjardins, S., Dubé, M., Lorrain, D., Préville, M., & Brassard, J.
Affiliations
  • Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières (CA)
  • Université de Montréal (CA)
  • Université de Sherbrooke (CA)
  • Hôpital Charles-Le Moyne (CA)
Corresponding author
Lapierre, Sylvie
Venue
International Psychogeriatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-02
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
243-252
ISSN
1041-6102 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2157924898
Cited by
91
References
37
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
FWCI
6.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Psychogeriatrics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (200403MOP)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Keywords
desire for death, suicidal ideation, older adults, daily hassles, physical illness, sleep disorders, chronic disease, self-rated physical health, pain, daytime dysfunction, suicide prevention, community-dwelling older adults
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Attitude to Death, Chronic Disease, Depression, Female, Health Status, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Sleep Wake Disorders, Socioeconomic Factors, Prevalence, Logistic Models, Case-Control Studies, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review