Cited by 118Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesPsychiatric care and mental health servicesOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

Establishing standards for the assessment of suicide risk among callers to the national suicide prevention lifeline

Open access
Joiner, Thomas, Kalafat, John, Draper, John, Stokes, Heather, Knudson, Marshall, Berman, Alan L., McKeon, Richard·2007·Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior

Abstract

The National Suicide Prevention Lifeline was launched in January 2005. Lifeline, supported by a federal grant from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, consists of a network of more than 120 crisis centers located in communities across the country that are committed to suicide prevention. Lifeline's Certification and Training Subcommittee conducted an extensive review of research and field practices that yielded the Lifeline's Suicide Risk Assessment Standards. The authors of the current paper provide the background on the need for these standards; describe the process that produced them; summarize the research and rationale supporting the standards; review how these standard assessment principles and their subcomponents can be weighted in relation to one another so as to effectively guide crisis hotline workers in their everyday assessments of callers to Lifeline; and discuss the implementation process that will be provided by Lifeline.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1521/suli.2007.37.3.353

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Joiner, T., Kalafat, J., Draper, J., Stokes, H., Knudson, M., Berman, A. L., & McKeon, R.
Affiliations
  • Florida State University (US)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (US)
Corresponding author
Joiner, Thomas
Venue
Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-06
Volume
37
Issue
3
Pages
353-365
ISSN
  • 0363-0234 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-278X
OpenAlex
W2098147735
Cited by
118
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
  • Center for Mental Health Services
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
suicide risk assessment, crisis hotlines, suicide prevention, assessment standards, suicide prevention training
MeSH terms
Crisis Intervention, Humans, Risk Factors, Suicide, Attempted, Hotlines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review