Cited by 37Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNursing care and researchGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes

The Going to Stay at Home program: Combining dementia caregiver training and residential respite care

Open access
Gresham, Meredith, Heffernan, Megan, Brodaty, Henry, Haapala, Irja, Biggs, Simon, Kurrle, Susan·2018·International Psychogeriatrics

Abstract

ABSTRACTBackground:Caring for persons with dementia is stressful for family caregivers. Caregiver training programs and respite care can reduce this stress and help maintain persons with dementia living longer in the community. We evaluated a program that combines caregiver training with a residential respite stay. METHODS: In total, 90 dyads of persons with dementia and their caregivers, in groups of 3-6 dyads, volunteered to participate in a five-day residential training program and were followed-up 6 and 12 months later. The primary outcome was caregiver depression; secondary outcomes were measures of caregiver burden, unmet needs, person with dementia behavioral symptoms, and the quality of life and function. RESULTS: Caregiver depression and burden were unchanged, despite decreasing function in persons with dementia. Caregivers' unmet needs and behavioral symptoms in persons with dementia decreased significantly. Compared to a group of persons with dementia admitted for routine residential respite care, there was a marked reduction in permanent placement over 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: The Going to Stay at Home Program is a feasible and practicable model with benefits for caregivers and persons with dementia. It may lead to delay in institutionalization and may be applicable to other chronic conditions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1041610218000686

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When present, dementia education and respite services reduced stress and enabled caregivers to make timely transitions to long-term care.

    “When present, dementia education and respite services reduced stress and enabled caregivers to make timely transitions to long-term care (Gresham et al., 2018).”

    From Mind the gap: a systematic review of barriers, facilitators, and experiences of care transitions for people living with dementia and their informal caregivers. (2026) · cites this paper as Gresham et al., 2018

    The Discussion reports no reduction in caregiver psychological distress or burden after the combined training and respite program. The Abstract reports fewer permanent placements over 12 months and says the program may delay institutionalization, rather than showing that it enabled timely transitions to long-term care. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Multidisciplinary teams and dementia-integrated care models in assisted living, skilled nursing settings, and cottage models of respite care were also positively viewed.

    “Multidisciplinary teams and dementia-integrated care models in assisted living, skilled nursing settings, and cottage models of respite care were also positively viewed (Gresham et al., 2018; Harkin et al., 2020; Johannessen et al., 2019; Manis et al., 2021).”

    From Mind the gap: a systematic review of barriers, facilitators, and experiences of care transitions for people living with dementia and their informal caregivers. (2026) · cites this paper as Gresham et al., 2018

    The Setting and Staff sections describe a cottage-based residential respite program with staff from several disciplines. In the Discussion (page not available), caregivers reported that the residential stay was beneficial and that time with staff was valuable. The paper does not report positive views of multidisciplinary teams as such or evaluate care models across assisted living and skilled nursing settings. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gresham, M., Heffernan, M., Brodaty, H., Haapala, I., Biggs, S., & Kurrle, S.
Affiliations
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Gresham, Meredith
Venue
International Psychogeriatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-11
Volume
30
Issue
11
Pages
1697-1706
ISSN
1041-6102 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2884499999
Cited by
37
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Psychogeriatrics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Australian Government
  • Department of Social Services, Australian Government
  • University of New South Wales
  • Dementia Collaborative Research Centres, Australia
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Keywords
dementia, family caregivers, caregiver education, caregiver depression, caregiver burden, unmet needs, behavioral symptoms, quality of life, community living, institutionalization
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Dementia, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Respite Care, Program Evaluation, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review