Cited by 27Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchOccupational Health and PerformanceDisaster Response and Management

Paramedic and emergency medical technician reflections on the ongoing impact of the 9/11 terrorist attacks

Open access
Smith, Erin C., Burkle, Frederick M.·2019·Prehospital and Disaster Medicine

Abstract

IntroductionIn the years following the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks in New York City (New York USA), otherwise known as 9/11, first responders began experiencing a range of health and psychosocial impacts. Publications documenting these largely focus on firefighters. This research explores paramedic and emergency medical technician (EMT) reflections on the long-term impact of responding to the 9/11 terrorist attacks. METHODS: Qualitative methods were used to conduct interviews with 54 paramedics and EMTs on the 15-year anniversary of 9/11. RESULTS: Research participants reported a range of long-term psychosocial issues including posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety, depression, insomnia, relationship breakdowns and impact on family support systems, and addictive and risk-taking behaviors. Ongoing physical health issues included respiratory disorders, eye problems, and cancers.DiscussionThese findings will go some way to filling the current gap in the 9/11 evidence-base regarding the understanding of the long-term impact on paramedics and EMTs. The testimony of this qualitative research is to ensure that an important voice is not lost, and that the deeply personal and richly descriptive experiences of the 9/11 paramedics and EMTs are not forgotten. SmithEC, BurkleFMJr. Paramedic and emergency medical technician reflections on the ongoing impact of the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2019;34(1):56-61.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1049023x18001255

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Smith, E. C., & Burkle, F. M.
Affiliations
  • Edith Cowan University (AU)
  • Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars (US)
Corresponding author
Smith, Erin C.
Venue
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine
Published
2019-02
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
56-61
ISSN
  • 0882-7397 (ISSN-L)
  • 1049-023X
  • 1945-1938
OpenAlex
W2911686819
Cited by
27
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4
FWCI
2.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Prehospital and Disaster Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchOnline at James Cook University (James Cook University) (submittedVersion)
  • Australasian Journal of Paramedicine (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Performance
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Disaster Response and Management
Keywords
September 11 attacks, paramedics, emergency medical technicians, first responders, long-term health effects, post-traumatic stress disorder, psychosocial impact, respiratory diseases, cancer, addictive behavior, family support, 15th anniversary
MeSH terms
Allied Health Personnel, Emergency Medical Technicians, Humans, Interviews as Topic, United States, September 11 Terrorist Attacks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review