The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.
Public Support for Environmental Protection: Objective Problems and Subjective Values in 43 Societies
Abstract
Policies designed to solve environmental problems are unlikely to succeed unless they have broad public support, but the motives for mass support are poorly understood. The problem is global in scope, but most of the relevant public opinion research done so far has been carried out in advanced industrial societies, usually Western democracies. Moreover, much of this research is limited to the tip of the iceberg, focusing on what people think about environmental problems without probing into why they think it or how deeply they are committed.The analysis of mass attitudes toward environmental problems in this article uses evidence from representative national surveys of countries representing the entire developmental spectrum, from rich to poor nations, including not only Western democracies but authoritarian regimes and recently emerging democracies from the former communist bloc. The data come from the 1990–93 World Values survey, carried out in 43 countries containing 70% of the world's population. Our goal is to determine why given publics are—or are not—sufficiently concerned about environmental problems that they are willing to make financial sacrifices and undertake other actions in order to help protect the environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
(1999) · Western CEDAR (Western Washington University) · Cited by 3,944
Carbon lock-in: types, causes, and policy implications
Seto, K. C., Davis, S. J., Mitchell, R. B., Stokes, E. C., Unruh, G., & Ürge-Vorsatz, D. (2016) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085934 · Cited by 1,346
Cross‐National Gender Variation in Environmental Behaviors*
Hunter, L. M., Hatch, A., & Johnson, A. (2004) · Social Science Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.0038-4941.2004.00239.x · Cited by 799
Explaining Popular Support for Environmental Protection: A Multilevel Analysis of 50 Nations
Gelissen, J. (2007) · Environment and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0013916506292014 · Cited by 358
Carfagna, L. B., Dubois, E. A., Fitzmaurice, C., Ouimette, M. Y., Schor, J. B., Willis, M., & Laidley, T. (2014) · Journal of Consumer Culture · doi:10.1177/1469540514526227 · Cited by 350
City attachment and use of urban services: Benefits for smart cities
Belanche, D., Casaló, L. V., & Orús, C. (2016) · Cities · doi:10.1016/j.cities.2015.08.016 · Cited by 203
Environmental movements, ecological modernisation and political opportunity structures
Van Der Heijden, H. (1999) · Environmental Politics · doi:10.1080/09644019908414444 · Cited by 165
Direct experience and attitude change towards bears and wolves
Eriksson, M., Sandström, C., & Ericsson, G. (2015) · Wildlife Biology · doi:10.2981/wlb.00062 · Cited by 144
Are There Similar Sources of Environmental Concern? Comparing Industrialized Countries*
Marquart‐Pyatt, S. T. (2008) · Social Science Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6237.2008.00567.x · Cited by 125
Beiser-McGrath, L. F., & Huber, R. A. (2018) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-018-2260-9 · Cited by 91
Neugebauer, S., Traverso, M., Scheumann, R., Chang, Y.-J., Wolf, K., & Finkbeiner, M. (2014) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su6084839 · Cited by 79
Modelling Attitude towards Consumption of Vegan Products
Miguel, I., Coelho, A., & Bairrada, C. M. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13010009 · Cited by 47
Political consumerism as a neoliberal response to youth political disengagement
Kyroglou, G., & Henn, M. (2017) · Societies · doi:10.3390/soc7040034 · Cited by 40
Zhao, X. (2012) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637751.2012.672999 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Inglehart, R.
- Venue
- PS Political Science & Politics
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1995-03-01
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 01
- Pages
- 57-72
- ISSN
- 0030-8269 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2155200498
- Cited by
- 1,083
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 30.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.