Cited by 35Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

The Outcome Questionnaire 45.2. Italian validation of an instrument for the assessment of phychological treatments

Chiappelli, Marco, Coco, Gianluca Lo, Gullo, Salvatore, Bensi, Luca, Prestano, Claudia·2008·Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale

Abstract

Summary: Aims– The Outcome Questionnaire (OQ-45.2; Lambert et al., 2004) was designed to measure important areas of functioning (symptoms, interpersonal problems and social role functioning) that are of central interest in mental health. The crosscultural validity of the OQ-45.2 in the Italian population has been examined by comparing the psychometric properties and equivalence in factor structure and normative scores of the Italian OQ with the original American version.Method– Data were collected at university (N=461), in community (N=61) and in three mental health care organisations (N=301).Results– Results showed that the psychometric properties of the Italian OQ were adequate and similar to the original instrument. The CFA supported the multidimentional construct system of the instrument. Furthermore, normative scores were different for the Italian and American samples and this resulted in different cutoff scores for estimating clinically significant change in the Italian population.Conclusions– The Italian version of the OQ-45.2 appears promising as a measure of general psychological distress, and it could be used to measure the psychotherapy outcome in routine clinical practice. Declaration of Interest:

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1121189x00002852

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chiappelli, M., Coco, G. L., Gullo, S., Bensi, L., & Prestano, C.
Affiliations
  • Azienda USL di Bologna (IT)
  • University of Palermo (IT)
  • University of Bologna (IT)
Corresponding author
Chiappelli, Marco
Venue
Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale
Published
2008-06
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
152-161
ISSN
  • 1121-189X (ISSN-L)
  • 2038-1816
OpenAlex
W4297917639
Cited by
35
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
Italian validation, cross-cultural validation, psychometric properties, factor structure, normative scores, clinical significance, psychological distress, psychotherapy outcome, mental health services

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review