Cited by 305Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychological Testing and AssessmentCounseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics

The Use of Outcome Measures by Psychologists in Clinical Practice.

Hatfield, Derek R., Ogles, Benjamin M.·2004·Professional Psychology: Research and Practice

Abstract

This survey investigated psychologists' use of outcome measures in clinical practice. Of the respondents, 37% indicated that they used some form of outcome assessment in practice. A wide variety of measures were used thatwere rated by the client or clinician. Clinicians who assess outcome in practice are more likely to be younger, have a cognitive-behavioral orientation, conduct more hours of therapy per week, provide services for children and adolescents, and work in institutional settings. Clinicians who do not use outcome measures endorse practical (e.g., cost, time) and philosophical (e.g., relevance) barriers to their use. Both users and nonusers of outcome measures were interested in similar types of information, including client progress since entering treatment, current strengths and weaknesses, and determining if there is a need to alter treatment. Implications for practicing clinicians are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0735-7028.35.5.485

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hatfield, D. R., & Ogles, B. M.
Affiliations
The Ohio State University (US)
Venue
Professional Psychology: Research and Practice
Published
2004-10
Volume
35
Issue
5
Pages
485-491
ISSN
  • 0735-7028 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1323
OpenAlex
W2038869957
Cited by
305
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 13
FWCI
6.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Professional Psychology Research and Practice (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
Keywords
outcome measures, outcome measurement, psychologists, clinical practice, treatment evaluation, cognitive behavioral therapy, institutional environment, children and adolescents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review