The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Conceptual and Theoretical Analysis of Evaluative Conditioning
Open accessAbstract
Evaluative conditioning is best defined as an effect, that is, as a change in the valence of a stimulus that results from pairing the stimulus with another stimulus. This definition has several advantages that are made explicit in this paper. One of the advantages is that it clarifies that evaluative conditioning can be due to multiple processes. Therefore, the conditions under which evaluative conditioning is observed can depend on the processes that underlie a particular manifestation of evaluative conditioning. This could explain why there are so many conflicting results about the conditions under which evaluative conditioning can be found. Future research should adopt a meta-conditional approach that focuses not only on whether a certain condition is crucial for obtaining evaluative conditioning but should also examine when a certain condition is crucial.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reflective and Impulsive Determinants of Social Behavior
Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (2004) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_1 · Cited by 3,984
Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987.
Bornstein, R. F. (1989) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.106.2.265 · Cited by 1,970 · cited 1×
“For instance, research on the mere exposure effect has demonstrated that the repeated non-contingent presentations of a stimulus (i.e., repeatedly presenting the stimulus on its own) can change the liking of the stimulus (see Bornstein, 1989, for a review).”
BackgroundThe conditioning theory of fearacquisition: A critical examination
Rachman, S. (1977) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/0005-7967(77)90041-9 · Cited by 1,191 · cited 1×
“…higher-order conditioning), whether information about the CS-US relation is presented through experience, observation, or instruction2 (see Rachman, 1977), interactions between different contingencies (e.g., blocking), and whether the degree of contingency between the CS and US is…”
BackgroundDe Houwer, J., Thomas, S., & Baeyens, F. (2001) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.6.853 · Cited by 1,181
Characteristics of dissociable human learning systems
Shanks, D. R., & St. John, M. F. (1994) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00035032 · Cited by 1,163
Walther, E., & Nagengast, B. (2006) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes · doi:10.1037/0097-7403.32.4.454 · Cited by 82
Cited by
Lonsdorf, T. B., Menz, M. M., Andreatta, M., Fullana, M. A., Golkar, A., Haaker, J., Heitland, I., Hermann, A., Kuhn, M., Kruse, O., et al. (2017) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.02.026 · Cited by 837
The Associative–Propositional Evaluation Model
Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2011) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-385522-0.00002-0 · Cited by 426
De Houwer, J. (2009) · Learning & Behavior · doi:10.3758/lb.37.1.1 · Cited by 362
Self-citationWhy the Cognitive Approach in Psychology Would Profit From a Functional Approach and Vice Versa
Houwer, J. D. (2011) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691611400238 · Cited by 230
Self-citationThe Role of Awareness in Attitude Formation Through Evaluative Conditioning
Sweldens, S., Corneille, O., & Yzerbyt, V. (2014) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868314527832 · Cited by 130
Metadata
- Authors
- De Houwer, J.
- Venue
- The Spanish Journal of Psychology
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2007-11
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 230-241
- ISSN
- 1138-7416 (ISSN-L)
- 1988-2904
- OpenAlex
- W2168745339
- Cited by
- 354
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 36.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Conceptual and Theoretical Analysis of Evaluative Conditioning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s1138741600006491
- The paper
- De Houwer, J. (2007). A Conceptual and Theoretical Analysis of Evaluative Conditioning. The Spanish Journal of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1138741600006491
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.