Cited by 34Speech and dialogue systemsBiomedical Text Mining and OntologiesArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Designing a virtual patient dialogue system based on terminology-rich resources: Challenges and evaluation

Open access
Campillos-Llanos, Leonardo, Thomas, Catherine, Bilinski, Éric, Zweigenbaum, Pierre, Rosset, Sophie·2020·Natural Language Engineering

Abstract

Virtual patient software allows health professionals to practise their skills by interacting with tools simulating clinical scenarios. A natural language dialogue system can provide natural interaction for medical history-taking. However, the large number of concepts and terms in the medical domain makes the creation of such a system a demanding task. We designed a dialogue system that stands out from current research by its ability to handle a wide variety of medical specialties and clinical cases. To address the task, we designed a patient record model, a knowledge model for the task and a termino-ontological model that hosts structured thesauri with linguistic, terminological and ontological knowledge. We used a frame- and rule-based approach and terminology-rich resources to handle the medical dialogue. This work focuses on the termino-ontological model, the challenges involved and how the system manages resources for the French language. We adopted a comprehensive approach to collect terms and ontological knowledge, and dictionaries of affixes, synonyms and derivational variants. Resources include domain lists containing over 161,000 terms, and dictionaries with over 959,000 word/concept entries. We assessed our approach by having 71 participants (39 medical doctors and 32 non-medical evaluators) interact with the system and use 35 cases from 18 specialities. We conducted a quantitative evaluation of all components by analysing interaction logs (11,834 turns). Natural language understanding achieved an F-measure of 95.8%. Dialogue management provided on average 74.3 (±9.5)% of correct answers. We performed a qualitative evaluation by collecting 171 five-point Likert scale questionnaires. All evaluated aspects obtained mean scores above the Likert mid-scale point. We analysed the vocabulary coverage with regard to unseen cases: the system covered 97.8% of their terms. Evaluations showed that the system achieved high vocabulary coverage on unseen cases and was assessed as relevant for the task.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1351324919000329

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Current conversational agents are available via multiple digital platforms (telephones, mobile phones, tablets, computers) and in many virtual formats (chatbots, embodied conversational agents, three-dimensional avatars).

    “Current agents are available via multiple digital platforms, including telephones, mobile phones, tablets, and computers, and in many virtual formats such as chatbots, embodied conversational agents, and three-dimensional avatars [2,7,8].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Campillos-Llanos, L., Thomas, C., Bilinski, É., Zweigenbaum, P., & Rosset, S.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Venue
Natural Language Engineering
Published
2019-07-15
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
183-220
ISSN
  • 1351-3249 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8110
OpenAlex
W2961793453
Cited by
34
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Natural Language Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
virtual patients, natural language dialogue systems, medical history, medical terminology, French language, vocabulary coverage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review